EntirelyPossible

Joined

• started 44 topics
• posted 5,593 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by EntirelyPossible

• 
  44

  Absolute knowledge vs. Relativism

  by Vidqun in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  believing in a god is a leap of faith.

  being an atheist is also a leap of faith, and that goes for the evolutionists too.

  i believe in absolute truth as found in the bible.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  EntirelyPossible

  Spiritual things are nonsense to the nonspiritual, so I don't think I will convince you of anything

  Agreed. But, you see, you keep using math. Math doesn't work on faith. Just stick to "God told me" and your nonsense will make much more sense.
• 
  1495

  An Old Argument.... does it hold water?

  by AK - Jeff in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  estimates range from 4 million to 15 million children die from starvation each year on this planet.

  that's between 500 and 1700 children a day, depending on what numbers you accept.

  still, no matter which numbers you use, doesn't this make you arrive at one of the following conclusions?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  EntirelyPossible

  EP, I started the "Pot calling the Kettle Black" on this thread. It isn't racist and AGuest's use of it isn't racist.

  Thanks OTWO and Siz.

  That pic was totally a joke for Shelby/Aguest, that's why there was a wink after it. I don't think anyone was being racist at all in any way, i think shelby was joking when she said folks accused her of being a black pot and I was joking in return.

  In case Shelby or anyone else was offended, I apologize. What's funny in my head isn't always funny once it gets loose.
• 
  1495

  An Old Argument.... does it hold water?

  by AK - Jeff in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  estimates range from 4 million to 15 million children die from starvation each year on this planet.

  that's between 500 and 1700 children a day, depending on what numbers you accept.

  still, no matter which numbers you use, doesn't this make you arrive at one of the following conclusions?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  EntirelyPossible

  EP has the kind of mind that can see only error. He/she can see nothing good.

  Well aren't you just a bundle of not knowing what the hell you're babbling about.

  Fortunately, the grammar lesson paid off. Well constructed sentence, even if the content was BS. You're welcome.
• 
  1495

  An Old Argument.... does it hold water?

  by AK - Jeff in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  estimates range from 4 million to 15 million children die from starvation each year on this planet.

  that's between 500 and 1700 children a day, depending on what numbers you accept.

  still, no matter which numbers you use, doesn't this make you arrive at one of the following conclusions?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  EntirelyPossible

  And folks accuse ME of being a black pot...

  Oh, and...

  

  ;)
• 
  1495

  An Old Argument.... does it hold water?

  by AK - Jeff in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  estimates range from 4 million to 15 million children die from starvation each year on this planet.

  that's between 500 and 1700 children a day, depending on what numbers you accept.

  still, no matter which numbers you use, doesn't this make you arrive at one of the following conclusions?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  EntirelyPossible

  Seriously, boyz (peace to you all!)... your "best shot" is to take issue with dear N.drew's (the greatest of love and peace to you, girl!) grammar and punctuation?

  Not at all, why would you think it's a "best shot"? I am not at all above cheap shots, dear. N. Drew is abolute nutters, bonkers, bats in the belfry, on the express train to Crazy Town.

  I've tried actually conversing with him/her(?) and it's impossible, mainly because the writing is so poor it's hard to make heads or tails of the sentence structure.

  So yeah, it was a cheap shot.

  -EP, who had a child's portion too much whisky last night...
• 
  1495

  An Old Argument.... does it hold water?

  by AK - Jeff in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  estimates range from 4 million to 15 million children die from starvation each year on this planet.

  that's between 500 and 1700 children a day, depending on what numbers you accept.

  still, no matter which numbers you use, doesn't this make you arrive at one of the following conclusions?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  EntirelyPossible

  How else do you think I could ever know? I can only pronounce/spell it so that it's pronounced as he tells it to me, though...

  And amazingly it's just like modern American English! Or is it?
• 
  1495

  An Old Argument.... does it hold water?

  by AK - Jeff in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  estimates range from 4 million to 15 million children die from starvation each year on this planet.

  that's between 500 and 1700 children a day, depending on what numbers you accept.

  still, no matter which numbers you use, doesn't this make you arrive at one of the following conclusions?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  EntirelyPossible

  Either help or be quiet?

  For starters, that should have ended with a period or exclamation point rather than a question mark.

  You know what I want to say, but it isn't nice.

  No, I don't know what you want to say. It seems that you don't either.
• 
  1495

  An Old Argument.... does it hold water?

  by AK - Jeff in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  estimates range from 4 million to 15 million children die from starvation each year on this planet.

  that's between 500 and 1700 children a day, depending on what numbers you accept.

  still, no matter which numbers you use, doesn't this make you arrive at one of the following conclusions?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  EntirelyPossible

  How Cofty? To feel special. After all, GOD is going to be doing all the killing, not them. They are just special enough to get to enjoy it.
• 
  1495

  An Old Argument.... does it hold water?

  by AK - Jeff in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  estimates range from 4 million to 15 million children die from starvation each year on this planet.

  that's between 500 and 1700 children a day, depending on what numbers you accept.

  still, no matter which numbers you use, doesn't this make you arrive at one of the following conclusions?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  EntirelyPossible

  I have done some bad things.

  Agreed. You routinely chop logic to death and murder grammar.
• 
  1495

  An Old Argument.... does it hold water?

  by AK - Jeff in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  estimates range from 4 million to 15 million children die from starvation each year on this planet.

  that's between 500 and 1700 children a day, depending on what numbers you accept.

  still, no matter which numbers you use, doesn't this make you arrive at one of the following conclusions?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  EntirelyPossible

  Apparently not, dear EP (as always, peace to you!). There is no English word "hallel". It is a Hebrew word accepted in English. Like "Gehenna". If my Lord was given me the ENGLISH rendition, he would have said, "Praise you, Jah."

  I never said there was. I specifically said it was a transliteration. Which it is.

  I am referring the word "hallel", which means "praise" in Hebrew. You know, the plural imperative of which is "hallal"? The Arabic word (which my Lord did not speak to me) is "Alhamdulillah" (or "Praise you God... wait for it... Yah").

  You are STILL using transliterations with a modern Latin alphabet of a words that NO ONE knows how it was originally pronounced. This makes your modern English sound it out comparison invalid.

  You may as well say that the Chin Dynasty got its name from the chin on your face because they sound the same in English and are spelled the same in the Latin alphabet. Totally invalid comparison.

  [But wait - are you thinking that I'm comparing "hallel" (hallal) to "halal"... from the Islamic meaning "lawful"... as in Islamic meat?? If so, then we're talking apples (me) and oranges (you).

  No, I am not thinking that at all. Why would I be thinking that? And oranges are superior, they prevent scurvy. Apples prevent...not having apples.

  I know a few Muslims and they agree.

  They are just as wrong.

  But totally fine for, say, "Jesus", "Jehovah", "Yahweh" and the like... yes?

  That depends on what you are doing. If you are making a comparison within the same language then it is whhen comparing if the words are related. For knowing how they were pronounced 3000 years ago, then no, because we don't know that. And they are all still transliterations.