By no means do I have definitive answers to some of your questions. Obviously they are very secretive, and even if one gets a copy of an annual report it does not give the true picture. Expatbrit has published some startling material that revealed large cash holdings a few years back.
That said, a couple of points. Cash flow bind is a relative term; a very real question relates to what will expenses be in the future, given some of the tax questions in various countries. Will they get charitable status where they want it? Potential legal expenses loom large too. It has not been publicized that cases are regularly settled out of court with cash payments. It's safe to assume that figure has gone upward and will spiral in the future, even if current policy changes.
The Society's money folk have been very smart in past times; made some good investments--and some bad ones. They do not have a business council like the physicians or attorneys sessions. Typically the organization has not been very efficient. George Couch used to say that half the Bethel family supported the other half. I've personally witnesses situations in which they spent $50,000 to save $20,000--figuratively. They've really banged away at improving that.
You mention a fall guy; doubt that would happen in the finance field, but it is very possible or even likely in the "spiritual decisions" department. They have persisted in a wrong-headed policy on abuse and have mired themselves in it. The blood issue is seen to be terribly inconsistent at best, and it is known that many inside would like to change it but the concern is over further disillusionment.
Belbab, I recall a very thoughtful post of yours some time back that was very insightful, and I suggest it might be helpful to some if you could redo it. I can only shake my head when folks speak of the old guard dying off and new blood replacing them. The assumption was that replacements would be younger and therefore more liberal.
You had a personal experience with a governing body member DS that really illustrates the folly of that kind of thinking. If you ever have the time, I hope you can repeat it on this board, because it really gave insight into their thinking process. Incidentally it was Splane who reportedly suggested at the table the term GB could be widened to include "those taking the lead."
Max