My questions are similar to Sir82's.
In other cases, Candace Conti for example, she was abused by someone the elders knew to be a child abuser. They were guilty because they failed to protect her from a known molester.
The same is true in the Gonzalo Campos cases in San Diego. Campos was known by the elders to be a molester. He was later made an elder and took advantage of his position to molest several other victims. Again the congregation knew but didn't protect the other children, therefore the elders and the congregation bore responsibility.
In this case Terry Monheim (the abuser) was not previously known to be a molester, is that right? If this is right, and if this kind of case is actionable, it opens doors to lots of future cases that I didn't think would see the light of day.