ditto de la Farkel. I've got PAGES of precedents.
Basically, this is a matter of Church Law. It is in the precedents that the Secular Courts "are not qualified to sit judgment on a matter that is normally left for a Religious Tribunal". That's where the DF'ings go out the window. The "courts of the land" "don't do windows and they don't do Church Law". They won't touch it, not with your body parts, not with theirs.
Next, by the time most people complain of this, they are "past their majority" and have been baptized AND not complained or left after turning 18 or whatever. That "ratifies" the questionable decision.
To add more problems to this, the Baptism may not be viewed as a Contract, strictly speaking.
All in all, WTS skates on this one, big time. Essentially, even when you look like you have a case, the courts will declare it a "religious matter" and disqualify themselves.
There ARE ways to fight such, but you are going to have to use picky technicalities TWO OR THREE LEVELS DEEPER THAN THIS and spend LOTS OF TIME, MONEY AND ENERGY. (Hint: "fight fire with fire".)
The simple one on the top won't cut it.
Mustang
Edited by - mustang on 7 September 2002 2:42:32