Posts by ttdtt

36

The "most honest people" on earth....?

by stuckinarut2 in

have we noticed how often the society uses comments like this?.

"jehovah's witnesses are the most honest people...etc".

while it may be true that witnesses as a whole are decent, law abiding people, are they truely "honest" when the very foundation of beliefs are based on mistruths?.

ttdtt

To add to you "Most Honest"

Most Attractive people.
Most Intelligent
Most Peaceful
Best Educated
Most Innovative (MEPS)
Most Generous
Most Charitable
Most Loving (how do you measure that one?)

Most Gullible ( oh sorry that's mine :smile:

17

Elders & Ex Elders, did knowing sins of congregation members change how you treated them?

by Wasanelder Once in

when you found out all the sins of fellow witnesses did it effect how you treated them?

it was shocking when i found out the range of bs these people did to each other.

i don't mean sexual abuse, i mean fraud, theft, infidelity and more.

ttdtt

For me just that it was hard to take some peoples giant hypocrisy. Knowing their past and hearing some of their comments and how they treated others made me want to vomit.

23

New June Awake with Misleading Statements about Evidence for god

by ttdtt in

the article (faith) is all about why you should have solid evidence based reasons for belief in god.

it's not good enough to believe in god just because you were raised to believe in god.. (from the article).

but god wants those who worship him to have genuine confidence in his existence and in his love.. then it goes on to tell us how we can get that genuine confidence that there is a god.

ttdtt

How about the Chinese JW "college professor" they keep putting in the magazines about evolution. Don't the readers think he looks familiar? He would really have an unbiased opinion on the matter.

Next article - "The pope believes in the trinity" news at 11

42

Today's Daily Text - Being Uneducated And Ordinary... WTF!!!

by Divergent in

jw
friends

thursday, march 3. they were uneducated and ordinary men.—acts 4:13.. in recent years, the spiritual instruction provided by jehovah’s organization has reflected an increased emphasis on simplicity and clarity.

consider three examples.

first, there is the simplified edition of the watchtower.

ttdtt

My favorite line I used when that came out always ways - "hey speak for yourself" :)

23

New June Awake with Misleading Statements about Evidence for god

by ttdtt in

the article (faith) is all about why you should have solid evidence based reasons for belief in god.

it's not good enough to believe in god just because you were raised to believe in god.. (from the article).

but god wants those who worship him to have genuine confidence in his existence and in his love.. then it goes on to tell us how we can get that genuine confidence that there is a god.

ttdtt

stuckinarut2 To clarify, used by writers who can't prove their argument with any real evidence, and so must resort to ingenuine ways to get their point across.

I still have a hard time understanding how the person can write that and not have some conflict about it?

I remember going nuts when I was writing a talk for the hall or a convention and stuff did not add up. I usually ended up ditching that point and making one I had some basis for.

19

JWs Do Not Know How To Think

by xjwsrock in

i recall a conversation i had after an international convention.

it was recently in the united states.

the one where they played the jesus drama and all that.

ttdtt

I have to say - even from a JW point of view - that was the worst video the ever made.

ULTRA CHEEZY!

38

Proof of any Dragons

by pleaseresearch in

does anybody have any proof of the existence of dragons?.

we read in revelation about satan being the dragon, but aren't dragons mythological creatures?.

ttdtt

NO - but can you prove they DON'T exist!

23

New June Awake with Misleading Statements about Evidence for god

by ttdtt in

the article (faith) is all about why you should have solid evidence based reasons for belief in god.

it's not good enough to believe in god just because you were raised to believe in god.. (from the article).

but god wants those who worship him to have genuine confidence in his existence and in his love.. then it goes on to tell us how we can get that genuine confidence that there is a god.

ttdtt

Yes punkofnic!

And kodos for you OneEyedJoe! Guess you had a CO visit recently?

23

New June Awake with Misleading Statements about Evidence for god

by ttdtt in

the article (faith) is all about why you should have solid evidence based reasons for belief in god.

it's not good enough to believe in god just because you were raised to believe in god.. (from the article).

but god wants those who worship him to have genuine confidence in his existence and in his love.. then it goes on to tell us how we can get that genuine confidence that there is a god.

ttdtt

These deceptions continue to drive me mad.

23

New June Awake with Misleading Statements about Evidence for god

by ttdtt in

the article (faith) is all about why you should have solid evidence based reasons for belief in god.

it's not good enough to believe in god just because you were raised to believe in god.. (from the article).

but god wants those who worship him to have genuine confidence in his existence and in his love.. then it goes on to tell us how we can get that genuine confidence that there is a god.

ttdtt

The article (Faith) is all about why you should have solid evidence based reasons for belief in god.
It's not good enough to believe in god just because you were raised to believe in god.

(from the article)

But God wants those who worship him to have genuine confidence in his existence and in his love.

Then it goes on to tell us how we can get that genuine confidence that there is a god.
(from the article)

Studying the Bible will help you to find solid answers to important questions, including:

You may notice that there is a link to articles on 1: Who is God 2: Does god care 3: God's purpose.

What ISN'T there is a link to the ACTUAL QUESTION THE ARTICLE IS SUPPOSED TO HELP WITH.

What evidence is there of his (god's) existence?

Now for someone looking to BUILD FAITH in a god, wouldn't that be the 1st priority to learn about? For surely why would someone care about "his purpose" or if a "cares about me" if he has not established clearly that there really is a god?

The real reason for this omission is that the WT has never (nor has anyone else) provided real proof that he, she, it exists.

Proof is not, well the scriptures say he exists, it's not - well we live in an unlikely universe, it's not that there are 5000 kinds of apples (wondering if anyone gets that reference), it's not that man is doing a bad job therefore there must be a god who will step in, it's not I don't understand evolution so there must be a god.

Proof is proof, not a desire to want something to be real.
I don't believe that the earth is a sphere, it is. I don't believe that there is gravity, it is. I don't believe that 2 + 2 = 4, it is!
All the above if challenged can be proven easily all the time. It's not like Holy Spirit that only works when it works.

Once again, the WT uses the old shell game tactics in their literature.
Misdirection is their best play.

The article "Faith - what does the bible say" can be found at the link below.

https://www.jw.org/en/publications/magazines/awake-no3-2016-june/faith-what-does-bible-say/

ttdtt

Posts by ttdtt

stuckinarut2 To clarify, used by writers who can't prove their argument with any real evidence, and so must resort to ingenuine ways to get their point across.

I still have a hard time understanding how the person can write that and not have some conflict about it?I remember going nuts when I was writing a talk for the hall or a convention and stuff did not add up. I usually ended up ditching that point and making one I had some basis for.

I still have a hard time understanding how the person can write that and not have some conflict about it?

I remember going nuts when I was writing a talk for the hall or a convention and stuff did not add up. I usually ended up ditching that point and making one I had some basis for.