non_trias_theos

Joined

• started 10 topics
• posted 136 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by non_trias_theos

• 
  35

  Grammar For Farkies

  by non_trias_theos in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  case---a particular form of a nominal, pronominal or modifier that expresses a syntactical relationship between other morpho-phonic forms found in a sentence.. adjective---a part of speech that modifies a substantive by means of suffixes such as -er and -est or by functioning syntactically in a predicative or attributive way.. declension---a class of words belonging to one language with the same or a similar system of inflections.. gender---a grammatical category used to classify nouns, pronouns, adjectives and sometimes verbs.

  grammatical gender is not necessarily associated with actual gender.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  non_trias_theos

  $$$non-trias-theos and others like him/her are obsessed with Farkel and others with that kind of knowledge and intelligence.$$$

  Obssessed with Farkel? You people just blindly defend one another, don't you? Farkel says he is going to dog non. Non just beating him to the punch.

  $$$NonTrias envies Farkel and the like, because he/she knows that Farkel is right, bright, has common sense, can see through all the smog spewed by NonTrias and others and he/she will never even come close ...$$$

  You are biased. Farkel may be bright in some areas of life. But he is not all knowing. There is a lot that non knows which Fark does not. So why should non be jealous of Farkel? He is as wrong as the day is long when it comes to many thangs. And he need some classes in logic and grammar. He is the one who said he did not know what terms non used meant. Non was just showing a brother love.
• 
  21

  A Priori Proof For God's Existence

  by non_trias_theos in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  there are some propositions that rational substances know are true but do not know why they are true.

  this concept is illustrated when one reflects on problems associated with self-referentiality (godel's theorem).

  physicists also work with a priori ideas that they take as givens, notions without which thought would be impossible.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  non_trias_theos

  $$$Babble aside, there is no logical proof for the existence of God.$$$

  You obviously missed the point of non's "babble." There are many beliefs that doxastic agents hold which they cannot rationally prove including the belief that there are other minds. So what? esides, one man's rationality is another man's foolishness. Your mind is closed to the existence of God. Nothing that non says will change your mind.

  $$$If you think there is, let's see it clearly demonstrated.$$$

  Clearly and rationally demonstrate that other minds exist.

  $$$Go right on ahead.$$$

  You first.
• 
  35

  Grammar For Farkies

  by non_trias_theos in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  case---a particular form of a nominal, pronominal or modifier that expresses a syntactical relationship between other morpho-phonic forms found in a sentence.. adjective---a part of speech that modifies a substantive by means of suffixes such as -er and -est or by functioning syntactically in a predicative or attributive way.. declension---a class of words belonging to one language with the same or a similar system of inflections.. gender---a grammatical category used to classify nouns, pronouns, adjectives and sometimes verbs.

  grammatical gender is not necessarily associated with actual gender.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  non_trias_theos

  Hm . . .

  $$$The entity you are now addressing is non . . . not duns.

  You see I corrected myself. Is the person behind the entity the same person who was behind the dunscot entity that posted here last summer?$$$

  It depends on what one means by person and sameness. The reply to your inquiry also relies on my personal acquaintance with this duns character or with the individual who was the online entity you are talking about.

  larc

  $$$Since you are armed with these structural facts about language, let's see you write something coherent, logical, and unassailable (and don't correct my spelling.)$$$

  Is there any such thing as an "unassailable" text? Please explain to non what type of animal you are referring to.

  $$$It would also be in good form, if you spelled Farkel's name correctly. You see, I can correct you, but you can't correct me. haa haa! Besides, Farkel is a shorter word than unassailable.$$$

  I know how to spell Farkel. My wording was intentional so as to pun a famous series sold in bookstores. You figure out the series.
• 
  35

  Grammar For Farkies

  by non_trias_theos in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  case---a particular form of a nominal, pronominal or modifier that expresses a syntactical relationship between other morpho-phonic forms found in a sentence.. adjective---a part of speech that modifies a substantive by means of suffixes such as -er and -est or by functioning syntactically in a predicative or attributive way.. declension---a class of words belonging to one language with the same or a similar system of inflections.. gender---a grammatical category used to classify nouns, pronouns, adjectives and sometimes verbs.

  grammatical gender is not necessarily associated with actual gender.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  non_trias_theos

  $$$duns... er, non_,$$$

  The entity you are now addressing is non . . . not duns.

  $$$Some people learn to define every "phoneme" in the history of speech, others learn to think critically and logically.$$$

  And some learn how to do both.

  $$$You've made your choice, Farkel's made his.$$$

  Fark asked for the help. He claimed that he did not know what case and gender meant. Non thought he would show true love and help a brother out.
• 
  36

  Spanking WT in Benton KY

  by silentlambs in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  well we did it, 45 people were present for the first candle light vigil for silentlambs around the world.

  holly and heather berry were there along with many other victims who told stories, sung songs, and recited poems that were self composed to help them deal with abuse issues.

  there were many touching moments where you could feel the heartbreak and pain suffered by the expressions made.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  non_trias_theos

  $$$So to whom it may concern, whether you like it or not I am still standing and remain a Jehovah's Witness in "good standing." Dateline will not feature disfellowshipped persons as all decisions to date are on appeal. oops... looks like you got spanked again and just wait till you see the newspapers this weekend. Bad PR boys when you "beat your brothers"...$$$

  It is just so nice having a brother like Bowen who loves to dwell together in unity. My what a loyal and loving brother he is. He gets joy out of spanking the wt. This man is a true brother. Preach on, brother Bowen. No way he should be df for causing divisions.
• 
  35

  Grammar For Farkies

  by non_trias_theos in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  case---a particular form of a nominal, pronominal or modifier that expresses a syntactical relationship between other morpho-phonic forms found in a sentence.. adjective---a part of speech that modifies a substantive by means of suffixes such as -er and -est or by functioning syntactically in a predicative or attributive way.. declension---a class of words belonging to one language with the same or a similar system of inflections.. gender---a grammatical category used to classify nouns, pronouns, adjectives and sometimes verbs.

  grammatical gender is not necessarily associated with actual gender.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  non_trias_theos

  Case---a particular form of a nominal, pronominal or modifier that expresses a syntactical relationship between other morpho-phonic forms found in a sentence.

  Adjective---a part of speech that modifies a substantive by means of suffixes such as -er and -est or by functioning syntactically in a predicative or attributive way.

  Declension---a class of words belonging to one language with the same or a similar system of inflections.

  Gender---a grammatical category used to classify nouns, pronouns, adjectives and sometimes verbs. Grammatical gender is not necessarily associated with actual gender.
• 
  21

  A Priori Proof For God's Existence

  by non_trias_theos in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  there are some propositions that rational substances know are true but do not know why they are true.

  this concept is illustrated when one reflects on problems associated with self-referentiality (godel's theorem).

  physicists also work with a priori ideas that they take as givens, notions without which thought would be impossible.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  non_trias_theos

  There are some propositions that rational substances know are true but do not know why they are true. This concept is illustrated when one reflects on problems associated with self-referentiality (Godel's theorem). Physicists also work with a priori ideas that they take as givens, notions without which thought would be impossible. One should not be amazed therefore if Non now argues that there are ideas that are necessarily true (they obtain in every counterfactual situation) which cannot be proved true. Conversely there are also ideas that do not contradict any formal logical schema; however, they may be false in all possible worlds.

  One example: "nothing is red and green all over" (at the same time or in the same way). Paul Davies insists that one can deny this proposition without contradicting any formal logical scheme. But any such denial is probably false in all possible worlds. Rational substances therefore affirm the proposition's validity and soundness. It is a necessary a priori proposition. Logical necessity requires that the proposition "nothing is red and green all over" obtain in all counterfactual situations.

  What about the proposition, "God does not exist"? Davies maintains that the denial of God's existence does not contradict any formal logical scheme either. Yet the proposition could be false in all possible worlds. Could it be the case that the proposition "God exists" is an a priori necessary proposition that obtains in all possible worlds and that while we have good reason for believing the proposition is true, we cannot prove that it is factual?

  Maybe the words "God exists" are similar to "Doug cannot prove this statement is true." Can you prove the last proposition is true?

  Go right on ahead.
• 
  50

  Take Responsibility For Your Thrownness

  by non_trias_theos in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  we are the decisions we make.

  we are thrown into the world and left to make of it what we will.

  non trias thinks there is some truth to these observations.. god has allowed us to see the light of life so that we might make of it what we will.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  non_trias_theos

  $$$In his major philosophic work, "Being and Nothingness," Sartre conceived humans as beings who create their own world "by rebelling against authority and by accepting personal responsibility for their actions, UNAIDED by society, traditional morality, or
  RELIGIOUS FAITH."$$$

  Let me clear one thing up with you. Non is not saying that Sartre was a theist. What non is doing is offering a theistic reconstruction of Sartre's account of existential freedom.

  $$$gee, that certainly sounds like JW's....................
  maybe YOU should try reading Sartre........$$$

  Non has read Sartre. Pretty nauseating stuff.
• 
  46

  Love, Marriage and Leaving JWs?

  by non_trias_theos in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  have you ever heard bitter divorcees relate their experiences about their former husbands or wives?

  most of the time, if it is a wife telling the story, her former husband could not do anything right.

  he was a terrible father, lover, provider, cook, gardener and he smelled funky and was abusive.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  non_trias_theos

  $$$Why not answer my question as to why you post to this web site, or why you visit it at all?$$$

  I did not know that the owner requires members to give a reason for their visits. Does everyone have to state why he/she is here?
• 
  46

  Love, Marriage and Leaving JWs?

  by non_trias_theos in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  have you ever heard bitter divorcees relate their experiences about their former husbands or wives?

  most of the time, if it is a wife telling the story, her former husband could not do anything right.

  he was a terrible father, lover, provider, cook, gardener and he smelled funky and was abusive.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  non_trias_theos

  $$$They talk down to others, rarely answer any specific questions and mostly wish to provoke others.$$$

  You mean like many of the ex-jws in this forum?

  $$$After the gun threat he made (which I feel is reason enough for Simon to ban him) you can see one of our fellow posters immediately got extremely wound up.$$$

  Why must you lie? No one made any gun threat. Get real. All non said is that you best watch who you mess with these days. Just because someone is a Witness does not mean you can tell them FU to their face constantly or accost them in the street and seek to commit an act of violence. It might get one shot. That is no threat. It is reality, my friend. I also made it clear that I neither own a gun, want a gun, nor approve of persons carrying guns. You, my friend, are lying.