Hello everyone,
As a congregation secretary of about 20 years running (PIMO), I’m certain that “Joe or Jane Publisher” has little to worry about respecting their data. Congregations do not routinely provide an individual’s data to the Org. The Org doesn’t know your birth date, your baptism date, your publisher status, or your field service stats. In fact, as far as I know, it doesn’t know (or care) that Joe or Jane Publisher exists, other than as a number (your secretary reports the sums for the congregation, including the number of active publishers).
The exception to this is when a publisher “reaches out” for special privileges, such as:
Regular pioneer
Ministerial servant
Elder
Temporary or permanent Bethel service
Special Metropolitan Public Witnessing
School for Kingdom Evangelizers
LDC
Etc., etc.
In addition, you can show up on the Org’s radar (and thus have a file with data) if:
You are disfellowshipped (though not if you are simply reproved)
You write or call the Org, complaining about something or indicating skepticism regarding a JW belief. This will generate a letter or phone call to your congregation elders, along with a request for some of your data.
In the past few years, the LDC has asked congregations for the addresses of all active publishers in their territory for the purpose of rearranging congregation boundaries, etc., but (at least in the US) they have never asked for publisher’s names. Each visit, the circuit overseer gets a list of active and inactive publishers in the congregation along with their contact information, and it is possible that this information is shared with the Org, but I doubt it. It looks to me that the Org, for liability purposes, wishes to know as few details as possible of the congregation, its members, and their activities.
If you don’t want your data shared with the Org, my suggestion is to fly under the radar. Don’t request or accept any privileges and don’t create a kerfuffle, and you shouldn’t have anything to worry about.