All rights come from government. True, no government gives anyone the right to commit.
Murder all criminals as this will end all crime...until people who were not criminals previously to the mass murder commit a crime. Then a new judgment day for the next batch of murders is required.
Part of the issue is the egocentric thought that what a person does equals the person. People are not criminals - people commit crimes. Another issue is the punishment for crime may be labeled a "deterrent," but it is painfully obvious that it is not.
A human system of justice would protect a society while address the issues that drive the majority of crime. Harm is the issue. Not crime. The cure cannot be as bad or worse than the sickness.
Then we have laws against things that cause no harm to others or possibly even the self. How are the scales of justice balanced for people who do not use the crosswalk to cross the road? Do people who use Marijuana deserve a death sentence for possessing a plant that allegedly was created by a loving God? If someone borrows your Netflix login and password should they be forced to repay Netflix 7 times the monthly subscription fee?
The idea that a person has to be harmed for doing something unlawful is sadistic.