OK - to summarise, you accept greenhouse gas theory, you accept that human origin CO2 warms the planet, you are open minded on the causes of climate change and you feel an Ice Age beginning in 2014 is inevitable. You are not convinced scientific consensus exists with regard to climate change.
Did I get that right?
What you need more clarification on is previous planetary warming going back 11,000 years and 125,000 years. Correct?
You mostly got that right. I believe that humans can contribute to accelerating an eventuality that is destined to happen anyways with or without man. I think a new ice age beginning in 2014 is a remote possiblity, and if it happens, then we adapt just like we've always done. In other words there is little to no sense in running around in a panic, and regressing technologically for something that will inevitably happen anyways. I'd argue that things like this should give us more impetus to advance further, and perhaps diversify our planetary choices of where to live. I have no problem taking money from the military and giving it to NASA and other US based space research firms.
I would be very interested to hear some clarification/explanation though from the AGW body on how the earth was warmer and most of the ice melted prior to the industrial revolution.