think about the apostate-driven lies and 'dishonesties' that Jehovah's organization is permissive toward pedophiles.
He couldn't have put it in a more subjective way. What's permissive for some might not be permissive for the organization.
He should have addressed the specific points. Is is true that the organization makes no effort to contact authorities about such cases unless absolutely required? Is it true that unless there are two witnesses to this crime or a confession, no real action is taken? Is it true that elders do not warn other parents of the accusations, unless there are two witnesses or a confession?
So say that apostates thing the organization is permissive and that they don't agree with this, is pretty much useless and ambiguous.