is there any independently verified evidence that a miracle worker called jesus existed and did the things that the bible said he did?.
the four gospels were written by unknown authors many decades after the so called events, so can't be considered as eyewitness accounts.
i think that there may have been a apocalyptic preacher who was executed by the romans and the story evolved from their.
The 16th century copy of Pliny that contains the excerpt declares only that a figure named 'Christ' 'was worshipped as a god" and Christians had predawn chants and shared meals together. (love feasts of Paul?) This was ostensibly written about 112CE.
Pliny offers no evidence of a Jesus walking around Judea. The absence of some reference to him as a man may support the position that the Christians he examined did not know the Gospel story or understood it as dramatization.
is there any independently verified evidence that a miracle worker called jesus existed and did the things that the bible said he did?.
the four gospels were written by unknown authors many decades after the so called events, so can't be considered as eyewitness accounts.
i think that there may have been a apocalyptic preacher who was executed by the romans and the story evolved from their.
There are some people born blind and deaf. They never see anything and never hear anything, and yet they still can learn that sound and sight exist without personally experiencing "evidence" in the way a seeing and hearing person does.
Someone born without senses would be a mental vegetable.
Religious concepts and imagery follow (subsequent) natural world sensory experience. However, what I think you are suggesting is something exists "beyond the senses". That is the domain of spiritualists.
Me, I'm acutely aware of my susceptibility to deception and delusional thinking. I've resolved that 'best evidence' is the best defense.
is there any independently verified evidence that a miracle worker called jesus existed and did the things that the bible said he did?.
the four gospels were written by unknown authors many decades after the so called events, so can't be considered as eyewitness accounts.
i think that there may have been a apocalyptic preacher who was executed by the romans and the story evolved from their.
I agree with Halcon, that religious 'truth' is not hinged upon the tangible. For some of us, that's a deal breaker, for others it elevates the faith. Since I'm not the arbiter of what is a real religion, I can't argue the point. I can, and we have, argued whether the Jesus story as it appears in the relatively late Gospels can be defended with tangible evidence and the answer is, no.
It's a foreign field to die upon, historicity. In the earliest years of Christianity, knowledge (gnosis) and mystery took center place. Now it seems obsessed with shrouds and stone bone boxes.
for those who still believe in god and the bible, how do you feel/think about the name jehovah now?
i am one who never wanted to bring reproach on god's name.
i will admit using the word jehovah now makes me feel rather icky...like i am promoting a lie of sorts.
When I pray to God silently, He still knows I'm talking to Him.
That of course is how billions of people feel.
the director of ice appointed by biden couldn't contain anymore what the biden administration was secretly hiding from the american people and congress.
so he released his report a few days ago to congress, and revealed that hundreds of thousands of criminals and terrorists from afghanistan were being flown into the country in private planes during the night and releasing them into all the states.
this is not a republican report.
So, Democrats are secretly turning the world gay and trans while importing hundreds of thousands of Islamic extremists who hate gays. Is it really too much to take a few minutes and fact check?
is there any independently verified evidence that a miracle worker called jesus existed and did the things that the bible said he did?.
the four gospels were written by unknown authors many decades after the so called events, so can't be considered as eyewitness accounts.
i think that there may have been a apocalyptic preacher who was executed by the romans and the story evolved from their.
They are word pictures.
Absolutely. And word pictures/myths are powerful. That is the core. If you have a message, hard to understand, use word pictures and story. If the Gospel writers wished to convey their conviction that the Christ had been a mystery woven through the OT, how better than to use scores of OT references as story elements. At the same time link it to contemporary events and offer an explanation for the loss of the Temple and the rites.
is there any independently verified evidence that a miracle worker called jesus existed and did the things that the bible said he did?.
the four gospels were written by unknown authors many decades after the so called events, so can't be considered as eyewitness accounts.
i think that there may have been a apocalyptic preacher who was executed by the romans and the story evolved from their.
We are no longer discussing 'evidence' and that is ok. No one begrudges you the freedom of religion.
If however, I were to ask if you believe Jesus wears a toga, a golden crown and rides a white horse while swinging a sword, you probably would tell me no, that's symbolism and metaphor. Yet if I ask if Jesus wears a toga riding a donkey and stabbed with a sword, you will insist, yes, that is real. If one depiction is spiritual metaphor, why could not the other? You shared that ominous picture because for you it is powerful. Myth is powerful. There is nothing sacrilegious about understanding the Gospels as dramatization/metaphor. It is just a different conceptualization of Christianity than you are accustomed to.
is there any independently verified evidence that a miracle worker called jesus existed and did the things that the bible said he did?.
the four gospels were written by unknown authors many decades after the so called events, so can't be considered as eyewitness accounts.
i think that there may have been a apocalyptic preacher who was executed by the romans and the story evolved from their.
Vidqun....It always comes down to that. Quiet your mind, open your heart and believe or face the consequences.
is there any independently verified evidence that a miracle worker called jesus existed and did the things that the bible said he did?.
the four gospels were written by unknown authors many decades after the so called events, so can't be considered as eyewitness accounts.
i think that there may have been a apocalyptic preacher who was executed by the romans and the story evolved from their.
....treated as a local magician by his people.
That is the point of the story, his people do not recognize him for what and who he was.
Even the book of Mark portrays Jesus in a more realistic light than John.
You raise a good question; Do the supernatural aspects of Jesus grow with each retelling? (each successive Gospel). B. Ehrman takes that position as support for a historical Jesus. I see how he comes to that, but he is dismissing the writer's style of subtlety. The reader is to come to the conclusion just as the centurion does at the end of the story:
Certainly, this was God’s Son!
This apparently frustrated some copyists sufficiently that they added this identification in the opening verse. 1:1
The beginning of the good news about Jesus the Messiah, (the Son of God)
is there any independently verified evidence that a miracle worker called jesus existed and did the things that the bible said he did?.
the four gospels were written by unknown authors many decades after the so called events, so can't be considered as eyewitness accounts.
i think that there may have been a apocalyptic preacher who was executed by the romans and the story evolved from their.
29 They got up, drove him out of the town, and took him to the brow of the hill on which the town was built, in order to throw him off the cliff. 30 But he walked right through the crowd and went on his way.
19 That Sunday evening[a] the disciples were meeting behind locked doors because they were afraid of the Jewish leaders. Suddenly, Jesus was standing there among them! “Peace be with you,” he said.
