wt leaders are apostates in the true sense of the word
they are phony macaronis, imposters
FragrantAddendum
JoinedPosts by FragrantAddendum
-
22
August issue is now up on JW.com
by ozziepost injust a heads up that the english version with the changed cover is now up on jw.com.. i haven’t yet read it but if any you have the time i’m looking forward to people’s insights.. in the meantime i must find a red 🍷.
cheers,.
ozzie (of the ‘is he still here?’ class ).
-
-
-
36
Big News: August English Watchtower released on servers
by ukpimo inbig news.
just in from a friend who is fading.. disfellowshipping will no longer be a term used by jws.
study article 35, paragraph 4 footnote says this:.
-
-
FragrantAddendum
that's a really good question
looks like they're still there...for now
-
11
Marking has it's merits IMO
by enoughisenough init would appear the context about marking has to do with those who are not working to feed themselves, but meddling in others business.
a couple more scrptures to think about.
jesus said not to throw your pearls before swine.
-
-
FragrantAddendum
Choosing not to be close with toxic or harmful people is very different from a church labeling individuals with different opinions as persona non grata. It's a cult spin on normal behavior.
yes, yes, yes...this⬆️
-
46
August WT: DF'ing renamed "Removed." AKA: GB re-arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic
by WingCommander inso: the mystery has been clarified as to more "new light" / clarifications of decades old doctrine and procedure.
august watchtower has finally been leaked.
disfellowshipping?
-
-
FragrantAddendum
"Being “ removed “ actually sounds worse. It is like they have a mob hitman on stand by ready to kill you."
Sort of like "dealt with" and other mob-like euphemisms.
"Marking" as a term gives me bad vibes. It reminds me of "pointing the bone":
yeah, or this...
i was "marked" at one point in the WT KH
it had nothing to do with being "immoral" or what they say in their publications
i was "marked" for exposing stuff the wt hierarchy was doing
"the first rule of fight club"
once you know what goes on, you can't "get out" without "consequences"
-
11
Marking has it's merits IMO
by enoughisenough init would appear the context about marking has to do with those who are not working to feed themselves, but meddling in others business.
a couple more scrptures to think about.
jesus said not to throw your pearls before swine.
-
-
FragrantAddendum
i agree that the monsters are in charge in wt-land
(and many other places)
while i would never consider charles taze russell "altruistic"
(that dude was sooooo gross and conviving)
many of the rank-and-file people who were duped into following him
have had the most altruistic intentions
i think this picture is quite telling
they make russell look like a tamer of zombies
but he's actually the monster
-
25
Do we have "original" indipendent documents proving that Rutherford was an alcoholic?
by psyco ini was wondering if you could prove with "original" independent documents that rutherford was an alcoholic.... .
i read penton, but since he is a former jw he could not be considered an independent source.... .
-
-
-
11
Marking has it's merits IMO
by enoughisenough init would appear the context about marking has to do with those who are not working to feed themselves, but meddling in others business.
a couple more scrptures to think about.
jesus said not to throw your pearls before swine.
-
-
FragrantAddendum
mark sanderson
also the rest of these guys
they're all "mark" to me
i'd recommend anyone avoid them like the plague
they put poison in the water they're serving
-
299
Who told the first lie?
by nicolaou inthis is a continuation of the discussion which sprang from an unrelated topic.. so according to genesis, who told the first lie?
god told eve that if she ate from the tree of knowledge she would die that very same day.
in response to that statement the devil told her she would not die.. eve ate from the tree and did not die.
-
-
-
299
Who told the first lie?
by nicolaou inthis is a continuation of the discussion which sprang from an unrelated topic.. so according to genesis, who told the first lie?
god told eve that if she ate from the tree of knowledge she would die that very same day.
in response to that statement the devil told her she would not die.. eve ate from the tree and did not die.
-
-
FragrantAddendum
i have to go for now
but i hope to chat with you again later
- peace😘😌🫶
-
299
Who told the first lie?
by nicolaou inthis is a continuation of the discussion which sprang from an unrelated topic.. so according to genesis, who told the first lie?
god told eve that if she ate from the tree of knowledge she would die that very same day.
in response to that statement the devil told her she would not die.. eve ate from the tree and did not die.
-
-
FragrantAddendum
if adam and eve couldn't obey even a simple command about not touching a fruit despite not lacking a thing and not being hungry
i wonder how they would have faired with a command about not taking part in child pornography
seems the fruit was an easier boundary
what do you think?
