"Armageddon DID come in 1975. It had to because they actually said it would"
It came "invisibly". 🙄
a slightly tongue in cheek, but also serious roundup of jw speak and why trying to reason with them is like trying to chip through concrete with a plastic spoon.. how many can you think of??.
elder: 'yes.
i read through the material you asked me to at your judicial meeting - you're right we're both in a cult!
"Armageddon DID come in 1975. It had to because they actually said it would"
It came "invisibly". 🙄
the watchtower—study edition | august 2024. help for those who are removed from the congregation.
14 does what we have considered mean that we would completely ignore a person who has been removed from the congregation?
not necessarily.
'A more accurate statement would be, “…In the past, you would be forbidden from greeting such a person…”'
But the new kind and gentle WT never controlled or dictated behaviour within the congregations. 🙄 Those stoopid worldly governments keep trying to hold the leadership accountable! 😱
a slightly tongue in cheek, but also serious roundup of jw speak and why trying to reason with them is like trying to chip through concrete with a plastic spoon.. how many can you think of??.
elder: 'yes.
i read through the material you asked me to at your judicial meeting - you're right we're both in a cult!
"What did Tony Morris do?"
so: the mystery has been clarified as to more "new light" / clarifications of decades old doctrine and procedure.
august watchtower has finally been leaked.
disfellowshipping?
"Being “ removed “ actually sounds worse. It is like they have a mob hitman on stand by ready to kill you."
Sort of like "dealt with" and other mob-like euphemisms.
"Marking" as a term gives me bad vibes. It reminds me of "pointing the bone":
inspired by ron.w.
's thread:.
https://www.jehovahs-witness.com/topic/5992982038183936/lines-you-would-never-hear-from-jehovahs-witness.
Inspired by Ron.W.'s thread:
In honour of the light getting ever brighter, post your examples of this thread's title.
I'll start:
"Nice beard, Elder Jones!"
"Those slacks look so very practical for field service, especially in this weather, Sister Smith!"
a slightly tongue in cheek, but also serious roundup of jw speak and why trying to reason with them is like trying to chip through concrete with a plastic spoon.. how many can you think of??.
elder: 'yes.
i read through the material you asked me to at your judicial meeting - you're right we're both in a cult!
"What happens behind the bedroom door is none of our business". (Apologies if someone has said it already - the thread is getting rather long!)
a slightly tongue in cheek, but also serious roundup of jw speak and why trying to reason with them is like trying to chip through concrete with a plastic spoon.. how many can you think of??.
elder: 'yes.
i read through the material you asked me to at your judicial meeting - you're right we're both in a cult!
After the August Watchtower:
"And now for the marking talk".
"Oh, he was disfellowshipped!"
"No, we can't talk about unspiritual matter X, you're disfellowshipped!"
so: the mystery has been clarified as to more "new light" / clarifications of decades old doctrine and procedure.
august watchtower has finally been leaked.
disfellowshipping?
"Why all the cunning and lying about changes that are not real and thinking they're going to trick the Secular Authorities? JUST MAKE IT AN INDIVIDUAL CONSCIENCE MATTER. Most diehard JWs will follow tradition and shun dissenters and WT won't have to LIE about it all."
This is my question too. Genuinely loosening the reins wouldn't cost them too much.
At its core and at the top, the WT seems to be about how hardline they are. The rules seem over the top from the beginning. As in, not as harsh as is necessary to maintain order, but as harsh as they can get away with.
And this is the case now. Instead of a genuine backing away from harsh and unkind rules, they are only lessening them in the minimum sense that they think can persuade governments that they have changed.
As an outsider, I can see that the change is cosmetic. Governments are likely to see it that way too.
Ironically, if the WT was consulting with the exes, they might get some good clues as to what genuine changes need to be made. After all, these are the people with whom the various governments are consulting. The governments will simply ask the exes whose testimonies they have on their books if this is a substantial change, and the exes will simply answer "No".
so: the mystery has been clarified as to more "new light" / clarifications of decades old doctrine and procedure.
august watchtower has finally been leaked.
disfellowshipping?
"I was really hoping for the lifting of the ban on oral sex. I really was."
The two witnesses rule is your friend.
gillies is moving up quick.
wonder what kind of devilish acts he's done to get that job so fast.
hey, look!
The upside down JW reflection reminds me of the Loch Ness Monster: long neck and two humps.