I have also been enjoying this thread.
From what I have researched so far, and I am just a newbie at this, I
think what JanH has written is pretty much in agreement with what I
have read.
Since I'm still a Christian, I've been spending more time with modern
day Bible scholars and theologians trying to find out what they are
doing with all of this information. It really is quite fascinating.
Amazing - I recommended JP Meier's "Marginal Jew" book because he
writes extensively about all the sources offering proof of Jesus
existence. I don't recall whether or not Meier's mentions the
Babylonian Talmud, but my guess is that he would have covered that.
Checking this out could save you a lot of time. And if you don't
like Meier, how about Hans Kung or Raymond E. Brown? All of these
are reliable sources available at the library.
I had to get myself up-to-date with modern day Bible scholarship since
assumptions are made based on old views and lead a person down the
wrong track and wastes times. For example, you mentioned trying to
get a copy of a doc supposedly written by one of the "3 wise men".
Jesus birth stories are not considered to be literal historical
accounts. So it seems to me it would be a waste of time trying to
track down something supposedly written by someone who never
existed? Or did I misunderstand you?
Also, who wrote what when in the New Testament is totally different
than what jw's were taught and totally different than what the old
mainstream traditional orthodox Christianity has taught for years.
The authors of the gospels are considered anonymous and the gospels
were probably written after the destruction of Jerusalem in 70.
(Some believe that gospel of Mark was written late 60's?} The gospels
are not considered to be eye-witness accounts.
The historical existence of Jesus is not disputed by any serious
scholars today. However, there really is very little that can be
historically documented about him.
CPiolo mentioned the Jesus Seminar poll where member scholars
concluded that 80% or more of what has been attributed to Jesus in
the Gospels, was in fact, not said by Jesus.
There are different ways to interpret that poll. JS member & Fellow
Marcus Borg says: "AT LEAST 18% goes back to Jesus; these are the
saying about which the positive consensus is the strongest."
Borg also emphasizes that BOTH the Historical Jesus AND the Christ of
faith MATTER and are important. In other words, the Jesus Seminar
work is not eliminating large chunks of the Gospels as of no value.
That is a misinterpretation of the Jesus Seminar's work.
You can read more of Borg's comments at:
http://www.xtalk.org/j2000/debate.html
One more point...Did Jesus visit India?
This story originated way back in the late 1800's by Nicholas
Notovitch. The new books out today supporting that view accept the
Notovitch gospel as authentic. Edgar J. Goodspeed refutes the
Notovitch story in his book "Famous 'Biblical' Hoaxes".
Quester