Elijah,
Oh, yeah, that's why I've never heard of the Archko Volume. Because it's just a hoax! No scholars take this fabrication seriously. Here is a link debunking this obvious hoax:
http://answers.org/Bible/archko.html
Here are some excerpts from this ridiculous volume:
http://www.losttribes.org/white.htm
There's plenty of informationo available through google.com if you care to search. This is what I mean about supposed 'evidence' for the existence of Jesus. Whenever you look into it in greater detail, it's initial persuasiveness is destroyed. I have not yet seen any contemporary first-hand accounts of Jesus, nor any compelling non-contemporaneous evidence. The most interesting evidence almost always turn out to be clear interpolations or downright hoaxes. You would think there would be clear, unambiguous evidence (or at least some evidence at all) of God's son existing on this earth 2,000 years ago.
rem
"We all do no end of feeling, and we mistake it for thinking." - Mark Twain