a news article has the headline of " ‘case closed’: 99.9% of scientists agree climate emergency caused by humans"; see https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/oct/19/case-closed-999-of-scientists-agree-climate-emergency-caused-by-humans .
the article says in part the following.. 'the scientific consensus that humans are altering the climate has passed 99.9%, according to research that strengthens the case for global action at the cop26 summit in glasgow.. the degree of scientific certainty about the impact of greenhouse gases is now similar to the level of agreement on evolution and plate tectonics, the authors say, based on a survey of nearly 90,000 climate-related studies.
this means there is practically no doubt among experts that burning fossil fuels, such as oil, gas, coal, peat and trees, is heating the planet and causing more extreme weather.. a previous survey in 2013 showed 97% of studies published between 1991 and 2012 supported the idea that human activities are altering earth’s climate.. this has been updated and expanded by the study by cornell university that shows the tiny minority of sceptical voices has diminished to almost nothing as evidence mounts of the link between fossil-fuel burning and climate disruption.. the latest survey of peer-reviewed literature published from 2012 to november 2020 was conducted in two stages.
Interestingly, data had to be suppressed, indicating that "Earth's temperature hasn't risen for the last 15 years." I wonder why.
Except that Daily Mail article which you quote above is dated September 2013 - i.e., it is nine years out of date.
A lot has happened since then.
a news article has the headline of " ‘case closed’: 99.9% of scientists agree climate emergency caused by humans"; see https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/oct/19/case-closed-999-of-scientists-agree-climate-emergency-caused-by-humans .
the article says in part the following.. 'the scientific consensus that humans are altering the climate has passed 99.9%, according to research that strengthens the case for global action at the cop26 summit in glasgow.. the degree of scientific certainty about the impact of greenhouse gases is now similar to the level of agreement on evolution and plate tectonics, the authors say, based on a survey of nearly 90,000 climate-related studies.
this means there is practically no doubt among experts that burning fossil fuels, such as oil, gas, coal, peat and trees, is heating the planet and causing more extreme weather.. a previous survey in 2013 showed 97% of studies published between 1991 and 2012 supported the idea that human activities are altering earth’s climate.. this has been updated and expanded by the study by cornell university that shows the tiny minority of sceptical voices has diminished to almost nothing as evidence mounts of the link between fossil-fuel burning and climate disruption.. the latest survey of peer-reviewed literature published from 2012 to november 2020 was conducted in two stages.
Here's an Australian 10 year graph of temperatures in the lower troposphere (which would reflect world tendencies) to confirm what Anony Mous said. (Italics added)
This is not necessarily the case. Neither the surface (land or sea) nor the atmosphere warms - or cools - at an even rate. That is why springtime in the middle latitudes is often a very turbulent time.
a news article has the headline of " ‘case closed’: 99.9% of scientists agree climate emergency caused by humans"; see https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/oct/19/case-closed-999-of-scientists-agree-climate-emergency-caused-by-humans .
the article says in part the following.. 'the scientific consensus that humans are altering the climate has passed 99.9%, according to research that strengthens the case for global action at the cop26 summit in glasgow.. the degree of scientific certainty about the impact of greenhouse gases is now similar to the level of agreement on evolution and plate tectonics, the authors say, based on a survey of nearly 90,000 climate-related studies.
this means there is practically no doubt among experts that burning fossil fuels, such as oil, gas, coal, peat and trees, is heating the planet and causing more extreme weather.. a previous survey in 2013 showed 97% of studies published between 1991 and 2012 supported the idea that human activities are altering earth’s climate.. this has been updated and expanded by the study by cornell university that shows the tiny minority of sceptical voices has diminished to almost nothing as evidence mounts of the link between fossil-fuel burning and climate disruption.. the latest survey of peer-reviewed literature published from 2012 to november 2020 was conducted in two stages.
Vidqun,
That illustration is not exactly a scale drawing of where the planets are in relation to the sun.
The sun is 1.39 million km in diameter, whereas the earth is 148 million km away from the sun. Going by that picture, though, you wouldn’t think so!
have you seen this video about the covid vaccines?
have you got any views on the information?
i find it worrying at least.
"Not everything is so very black and white" .... very true, which is why the full story cannot usually be gleaned from merely an eight-second soundbite. More often than not, further explanation is necessary, making the checking of facts a bloody good idea!
The orally administered (or live) polio vaccine does not pose a threat to those who receive it (as might have been supposed from some of the reports being circulated). Rather, in rare cases, it has led to infection amongst the unvaccinated.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02501-3
It is only an issue in populations where the level of immunisation is either low or non-existent.
In other words, the battle against polio is a two-step process. Step One is the eradication of the "wild" polio virus. Step Two involves the continuation of the vaccination process to cover the entire population - so that mutated strains of the attenuated virus used in the oral vaccine don't get a hold.
(During the fight against any killer disease, arguably the greatest obstacle of the lot is complacency: i.e., getting the beast down on the floor with one's foot on its neck, then deciding "She'll be right, Mate", letting the thing go, and thus having to start all over again).
have you seen this video about the covid vaccines?
have you got any views on the information?
i find it worrying at least.
All I know is that the last polio death in this country occurred just before the widespread introduction of the Sabin vaccine, during the (southern) autumn of 1962.
Yeah - lethal stuff, these polio vaccines!
have you seen this video about the covid vaccines?
have you got any views on the information?
i find it worrying at least.
What I was talking about was a “blanket” or total ban on COVID-19 vaccines i.e. no exceptions whatsoever. What you are taliking about is a “partial” ban. If you do not know the difference, between “blanket ban” and “partial ban”, do yourself and everybody else here a favour and refrain from further posting until your grasp of the English language has improved!
have you seen this video about the covid vaccines?
have you got any views on the information?
i find it worrying at least.
No mate.
“Blanket ban” means banning the whole bloody lot - children, adults, and everybody else in between.
have you seen this video about the covid vaccines?
have you got any views on the information?
i find it worrying at least.
Denmark and other countries are discontinuing the vaccine mandates because of the adverse effects.
Some further explanation is here called for about the situation in Denmark.
In late April of this year, Denmark paused (but not cancelled) its vaccination program. This move had nothing to do with any adverse side effects of the COVID-19 vaccines. Rather, it was felt that with the arrival of springtime, plus the already high levels of vaccination in that country, there was little purpose in keeping the program going through the spring and summer period. However, even when that move was announced, the Danish Ministry of Health mentioned that the program would likely be resumed in the autumn of this year - at least for those 50 years of age and over.
This is in fact what subsequently did happen, according to a recent announcement from Denmark's Ministry of Health, (dated 13th September 2022).
https://www.sst.dk/en/english/corona-eng/vaccination-against-covid-19
Note also that this revived immunisation program is not limited to the 50+ age group - at risk individuals who are younger than this are also included.
Another thing to note is that while Denmark did cease offering the Moderna MRNA.0 vaccine to those under 18 years of age, it still continued its use of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine amongst that age group.
There has been no blanket ban of COVID-19 vaccines in Denmark, as some reports may have suggested.
ultimate justice means that conduct is not inconsequential.
.
History best indicator - evil prevails, always. There's no such thing as justice.
Hard not to agree with that statement!
ultimate justice means that conduct is not inconsequential.
.
“Karma”, “cheats don’t prosper”, “what goes around comes around” etc. If only!
Sadly, things seldom turn out like that, and all too often the bad bastard is the one who comes out on top.
