FedUpJW

Joined

• started 37 topics
• posted 2,320 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by FedUpJW

• 
  113

  Try To Be Less White

  by minimus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  that’s what coca-cola is telling their employees.

  .

  this is ridiculous!.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FedUpJW

  It is laughable to think management scrutinised every course available from the provider.

  But it remains the case that it is highly unlikely that management scrutinised all 270 courses about ‘diversity’

  Really?

  So am I to believe that you are calling me a liar? That is an easy question for you to answer. "YES", or "NO". Now go back and read what I wrote about the chain of command. Perhaps upper management did not see every single one of 270 courses, someone did though! These choices are not made by throwing a dart at a dart board, or closing ones eyes and choosing whichever one their finger lands on. And no, don't trot out the garbage claim that I said you claimed that!
  

  It large corporations there is a little thing called liability. That attaches to every corporate decision that management makes in one way or another, and for management to claim they did not have knowledge of a decision never has, and never will absolve them of liability for management decisions.

  I will decline to further engage in a battle of wits with an obviously unarmed person!
• 
  113

  Try To Be Less White

  by minimus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  that’s what coca-cola is telling their employees.

  .

  this is ridiculous!.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FedUpJW

  And it wasn’t someone just slipping it in the program.

  EXACTLY! Anyone who believes it was somehow, or by someone, accidentally and innocently slipped in has obviously never worked with a human resources department of a company the size of Coca-Cola.

  Training materials usually are chosen by a human resources manager or someone designated by them, then vetted by a corporate vice-president, then narrowed down to one or two selections, then finally sent to corporate legal department for approval, THEN the one that covers all the corporate bases is made available to the employees in general. At least that is how it was with the corporation I retired from that employed over 10,000 employees with a annual revenue of over 4.4 billion dollars (US) reported as of 2017.
  

  In the case of "Coke" does anyone believe that particular be 'less white' portion would have been removed had it not generated back-lash?
  
• 
  137

  Masks Are Coming Off

  by minimus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  a number of states are allowing people to not wear a mask.

  some think this is disastrous!

  what’s your view?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FedUpJW

  It's about time! I wonder what the dems will say when COVID deaths and infections do not spike?
  
• 
  28

  Looking back a year at Covid

  by pistolpete in

  1. social
  2. current

  march of last year covid was declared a pandemic that would take hundreds of millions of lives world wide.. here are the facts after a year.. the world population is 7,800,000,000 (billions).

  114,770,269 millions of people have caught the virus as of today.

  aprox 91 million recovered from the virus,.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FedUpJW

  This happened in Colorado (USA) not too long ago.
  

  The Grand County coroner is disputing the number of COVID-19 deaths the state is reporting for the county. The coroner maintains that only one person in the county has died FROM COVID-19, while two more people have died WITH it, for a total of three COVID-related deaths in the county. However, the state is reporting five for Grand. In disputing the numbers, Bock explained that a couple who died of gunshot wounds late last month have been included in the state’s numbers.

  Centers for Disease Control reporting protocol requires that anyone who tested positive for COVID-19 within 30 days of their death be included in these numbers. (In other words, LIE) These are reported FACTS, not some conspiracy. There is a reason for numbers to be artificially inflated. It means $$$$ to someone. It means control of citizens by someone. Thinking persons will ask who stands to benefit from the control, and reap $$$$ as a result of that control.
  
• 
  37

  Why Do Jehovah's Witnesses Dress Up For Meetings?

  by RULES & REGULATIONS in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  library.

  books & brochures.

  who are doing jehovah’s will today?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FedUpJW

  We should approach an alleged respected, spiritually mature brother or sister and beg them for their personal opinion about our style of clothing and grooming and then slavishly obey the instructions given.

  THERE, fixed WT's words.
  
• 
  37

  Why Do Jehovah's Witnesses Dress Up For Meetings?

  by RULES & REGULATIONS in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  library.

  books & brochures.

  who are doing jehovah’s will today?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FedUpJW

  Why do Jehovah's Witnesses dress up for meetings?

  Because God doesn't wear blue jeans and boots?
  
• 
  20

  Tiger Woods

  by minimus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  what do you think of him?

  i know he’s a great golfer.

  we know he just got into a major car accident (again).. i respect his golfing abilities but personally i’ve never cared for him and i think the press glorifies him sooo much.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FedUpJW

  I don't particularly care for him. The big question I have is what is his professional opinion on the COVID plandemic, and how does he think people should handle it. After all so many other "wise" entertainers have weighed in on it. LOL
  
• 
  56

  JW Net and Politics

  by snare&racket in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  this site was and remains instrumental in assisting people that want to leave the jw's.. there has been political discussion here for some time now, a good couple of years and it makes me feel a little uneasy.

  i just opened up the site for the first time in some weeks, of the 10 posts being discussed, 4 were by the same poster, about politics, promoting their right wing beliefs.. this has been the trend for some time now, the same name behind a peppering of posts stirring the right v left of politics.. i remain forever grateful to the site and it's founders simon & angharad, i appreciate that simon shares some of these these political beliefs.

  it would be a shame to see the site evolve from a place for jw freedom of thought and escape, to political squabbling, that the world is frankly tired of right now.. just to clarify, politics is my hobby, whilst my friends read the football scores, i'm reading polling data.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FedUpJW

  Just to clarify. . .I was attempting some humorous sarcasm FWIW.
  
• 
  56

  JW Net and Politics

  by snare&racket in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  this site was and remains instrumental in assisting people that want to leave the jw's.. there has been political discussion here for some time now, a good couple of years and it makes me feel a little uneasy.

  i just opened up the site for the first time in some weeks, of the 10 posts being discussed, 4 were by the same poster, about politics, promoting their right wing beliefs.. this has been the trend for some time now, the same name behind a peppering of posts stirring the right v left of politics.. i remain forever grateful to the site and it's founders simon & angharad, i appreciate that simon shares some of these these political beliefs.

  it would be a shame to see the site evolve from a place for jw freedom of thought and escape, to political squabbling, that the world is frankly tired of right now.. just to clarify, politics is my hobby, whilst my friends read the football scores, i'm reading polling data.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FedUpJW

  Dang it MMM, there you go with a pro right wing, heavy left, millennial, snowflake bashing comment in reply.
  
  
  
• 
  14

  Are parables literal or not?

  by RULES & REGULATIONS in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  “bible illustrations [parables] have more than one aspect.

  they … often have a prophetic meaning and application.

  moreover, some had a prophetic meaning for the time when they were spoken or shortly thereafter, and some were to have, in addition, a fulfillment in the distant future.” (insight on the scriptures (1988), wtbts, vol 1, pp.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FedUpJW

  Why is this parable taken literal when others are not? How do they explain this one?

  Here is a chart that may explain it better than I.