Oops, correction - "Britain" defeated France to become "King of the South".
As if any of this makes a flea-weight of difference to, well, anything.
don't know how many of y'all still watch it.. this month's topic is "the king of the north" - cook goes into monotonous detail over the jw interpretation about rome, germany, ussr, russia, etc.. leaving aside for other commentators the emotionally manipulative videos of jws in russian holding cells, the tearjerker interviews, the god-awful stiffness of cook (i suspect he has never genuinely smiled, much less laughed, in his 60+ years), just thought i'd comment on one topic.. the centerpiece of the program is a "morning worship" monologue from splane.
let's again just leave to the side the dude's pomposity, smugness, and inflated sense of his own genius, and think about this part of his monologue.. he was tracing the history of the "king of the north" and talked about how "britain" (not england, not the united kingdom, not great britain, but "britain" - no idea why they have that fixation - anyway...) became the kotn in the 19th century.. paraphrasing his comments: "britain would not have become kotn if france had its way.
france was much wealthier and more powerful, but at the battle of waterloo, britain defeated france.
Oops, correction - "Britain" defeated France to become "King of the South".
As if any of this makes a flea-weight of difference to, well, anything.
so, in a couple weeks, the jws move on in their bible-reading slog to the book of deuteronomy.. take a gander at deuteronomy 23:12,13:.
a private place should be designated for use outside the camp, and there is where you should go.
13 a peg should be part of your equipment.
So, in a couple weeks, the JWs move on in their Bible-reading slog to the book of Deuteronomy.
Take a gander at Deuteronomy 23:12,13:
A private place should be designated for use outside the camp, and there is where you should go. 13 A peg should be part of your equipment. When you squat outside, you should dig a hole with it and then cover your excrement.A peg should be part of your equipment. When you squat outside, you should dig a hole with it and then cover your excrement.
Sounds pretty simple, right? "Gotta go answer the call of nature, be back in 10" - right?
Except...
How many people were there? See Numbers 1:46
the total number registered was 603,550
And that's just the men!
WT Publications have stated repeatedly that the 600,000 men implied "3 million" total Israelites trekking thru the wilderness.
One example: https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/102004325
In 215 years, a small number of Israelites in Egypt increased to as many as three million
That's a lot of people! Let's think about this for a minute.
How densely were those people packed together in their 40 year camping trip?
Let's say they were packed together really tight. Really really tight. Let's say they were packed together as tightly as modern-day Chicago, which has a population density of 12,000 people per square mile.
So, to fit 3,000,000 people packed together Chicago-style, you need 250 square miles.
If they were arranged in a perfect square, that's about 14 miles by 14 miles.
What if you're one of the poor schmucks who is camped right in the middle? If you've gotta go, you have to hike at least 7 miles - 2 hours - to get "outside the camp". Probably a lot longer, as you are walking through a densely populated area, stepping around, over, past, hundreds of thousands of people on the way.
Oh - and then to get back home, you've got to hike another 2+ hours.
God forbid you have to go twice a day - that's 8 hours a day walking just to do your business "outside the camp".
You can pick other shapes than a square of course, but to get to a reasonable amount of time to walk to "outside the camp" you've got an oblong shape 100+ miles, maybe 200+ miles, long. So, was there a 200 mile long string of Israelite camps in the desert? That would make communication a bit tricky.
And again - that assumes an unrealistic population density for the Israelite nomads as thick as that of modern-day Chicago. The problem exacerbates enormously with more reasonable population density estimates.
OR.....
Maybe the writers of Numbers and Deuteronomy just make $#!+ up that sounded good, but really didn't think things through?
Evidently there were no "continuity checkers" in the late Iron Age.
some of my jw family that is waking up posed that question to my jw family that is still hanging on to jw belief.. the stepbrother that posed that question told me;.
"in all these years of being a jw, i actually never gave it much thought as to why jehovah had to kill millions of innocent animals that had nothing to do with mankind becoming evil.".
i keep picturing in my mind, all the baby puppies and kitties that were destroyed by jehovah.
And yet....
Not so many years afterward, Jehovah felt sorry for the animals he would have "had to" kill in Nineveh.
Jonah 4:11:
Should I not also feel sorry for Ninʹe·veh the great city, in which there are more than 120,000 men who do not even know right from wrong, as well as their many animals?
Maybe the Assyrian donkeys were more repentant than the Noachian ones?
don't know how many of y'all still watch it.. this month's topic is "the king of the north" - cook goes into monotonous detail over the jw interpretation about rome, germany, ussr, russia, etc.. leaving aside for other commentators the emotionally manipulative videos of jws in russian holding cells, the tearjerker interviews, the god-awful stiffness of cook (i suspect he has never genuinely smiled, much less laughed, in his 60+ years), just thought i'd comment on one topic.. the centerpiece of the program is a "morning worship" monologue from splane.
let's again just leave to the side the dude's pomposity, smugness, and inflated sense of his own genius, and think about this part of his monologue.. he was tracing the history of the "king of the north" and talked about how "britain" (not england, not the united kingdom, not great britain, but "britain" - no idea why they have that fixation - anyway...) became the kotn in the 19th century.. paraphrasing his comments: "britain would not have become kotn if france had its way.
france was much wealthier and more powerful, but at the battle of waterloo, britain defeated france.
Don't know how many of y'all still watch it.
This month's topic is "the King of the North" - Cook goes into monotonous detail over the JW interpretation about Rome, Germany, USSR, Russia, etc.
Leaving aside for other commentators the emotionally manipulative videos of JWs in Russian holding cells, the tearjerker interviews, the god-awful stiffness of Cook (I suspect he has never genuinely smiled, much less laughed, in his 60+ years), just thought I'd comment on one topic.
The centerpiece of the program is a "morning worship" monologue from Splane. Let's again just leave to the side the dude's pomposity, smugness, and inflated sense of his own genius, and think about this part of his monologue.
He was tracing the history of the "king of the north" and talked about how "Britain" (not England, not the United Kingdom, not Great Britain, but "Britain" - no idea why they have that fixation - anyway...) became the KOTN in the 19th century.
Paraphrasing his comments: "Britain would not have become KOTN if France had its way. France was much wealthier and more powerful, but at the Battle of Waterloo, Britain defeated France. France should have won, but a great rainstorm came and allowed Britain to win, thus becoming KOTN. Of course, Britain was not interested in sharing its power. So, the American colonies declared their independence and fought to gain it. Mistakes were made on both sides but the Americans prevailed."
It's just such a...mishmash....it's...it's....
There's an expression, when someone says stuff that is just so flat out bizarre and weird and convoluted, that it's "not even wrong".
If someone says, for example, "The US gained its independence from Pakistan in the 18th century", you can point out the error ("not Pakistan, but the UK"). Or if they say "Napoleon lost the battle of Waterloo in 1066" again, you can point out the error ("1815, not 1066)". You can correct it.
But if someone says "Aristotle's writings are the reason why George Washington built his mausoleum in Monticello using ancient Egyptian techniques"....you're just left with your mouth hanging open. Where do you start?
Splane's comments are just so....so....I don't know, where do you even begin to correct it?
It's so completely unhinged, it's "not even wrong".
Anyways, just thought I'd share my rambling comments. Anyone else see it?
some of my jw family that is waking up posed that question to my jw family that is still hanging on to jw belief.. the stepbrother that posed that question told me;.
"in all these years of being a jw, i actually never gave it much thought as to why jehovah had to kill millions of innocent animals that had nothing to do with mankind becoming evil.".
i keep picturing in my mind, all the baby puppies and kitties that were destroyed by jehovah.
Fish and birds survived
Most birds can't swim.
With the earth literally 100% covered in water, the salinity of the water would be consistent worldwide. So did the freshwater fish die? Or the saltwater fish? Or both?
I guess the seagulls and the ducks were OK.
Oh. Except for not having anything to eat for a year.
Everything died.
Except all vegetation. Olive trees, and everything else, survived after an entire year underwater and without sunlight.
OK, gotta stop. Trying to think this stupidly makes my head hurt.
street-talk with jehovah's witnesses.
opening up a street-level dialogue with jehovah's witnesses:.
since this will probably be a one time occurrence, an important objective of any street encounter is to bless jws with doubt about their beloved organization.. after exchanging niceties, you might say something like:.
After about the 3rd question, the JW will peg you as an "apostate" (using the WT definition of the word: "Anyone critical in any sense whatsoever of the teaching of the Watchtower Organization") and shut down. If he is engaged in "public witnessing" he will walk, and if necessary, run away.
I.e., you'll never get to ask the majority of your questions.
JWs used to be trained to defend their beliefs. Now that non-JWs realize what questions to ask to expose the undefendability (is that a word?) of those beliefs, JWs have been trained, over the past 2-3 decades, to (if necessary, literally) walk away.
actors' acceptance speeches have often been a little dodgy - viewers don't care what political or social views actors may have, we typically appreciate actors acting well.. this year's oscars awards ceremony seems to be going above and beyond, however.. here's frances mcdormand's acceptance speech, in which she dedicates her victory to 'our wolf' and then howls like a bitch, lol.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-_be0awgwk.
For all the folks offended by "wokeness"....maybe visiting here would help?
They have started pencilling in dates for one day assemblies in early 2022.
Which countries?
How reliable is your source?
new america without boarders is now sending its uneducated, sometimes criminal and gang members, mostly illiterate people who have nothing to offer to any country they want to go if they think they can better their life.
so look for our lowest common denominator coming to your country soon.
.
what is the source of this info?
OANN, Newsmax, Fox, Tucker Carlson....
i give him an f for falling down on the job..
I really really was impressed when I watched Biden's address to congress yesterday
Get prepared to be hammered by the "Joe has dementia" crowd.
Incoming!