steve2, scrtachmore1010,
One beautiful flower!
Yet a poet, a devotee, a lover, flower-merchant, a worm, scientist … all will
have different view and comments about it. So is the case with the simple
illustration I heard in the PT. But I still know deep within my heart that this
is the best comparison I have heard on the subject because it accomplishes two major things:
1) It shows that “it takes a writer to do the
writing (life) in other parts of the universe” which points to the fact that
God is needed for life forms to appear in universe which is otherwise like a
barren woman.
2) If evolution were a fact, the whole universe
would have filled with life-forms (just like a field becomes filled with weeds
as the passes by) in view of the (virtually) infinite time that has already
passed! This is something we can testify in our present age of sophisticated
technology. If evolution happened and reached the present stage without
any external guidance, that would also mean that we can accomplish more with external guidance and advanced
technological intervention and equipment—yet we were unable to prevent
extinction of many species that have already happened and how are we going to
prevent extinction that is now under way? Will it happen even if we put all our
sophisticated technology, tools and all the laboratories in the world?