I'm with Jgnat and Ninja on this one. Outrageous, crackpot claims that are entirely unsubstantiated and that are totally contrary to everyone elses experiences in the WTS just make us look like, well, crackpots and idiots.
Ravyn's "story" was full of holes and contradictions, and completely lacking in outside verification. I've had several friends in the writing and art departments at Bethel for many years, and the concept of them using the "channelled" writings of a child as the basis for Watchtower articles is completely contrary to anything in my experience or of that of people in the know whom I trust.
I'm not saying that Ravyn is your typical charlatan. She may very well totally believe that she was involved in satanic rituals at Bethel. My take on this is that we were much more likely exposed to a person with serious mental and emotional illness and issues, a very common situation among those claiming SRA.
I understand the need to allow people to tell their stories, and I'm a firm believer in freedom of speech and the press. I don't think that's the issue here. What might have been learned from this is the need for caution so that a person with mental issues isn't taken advantage of by being allowed to expose herself in such a public platform. Most scientests I know are firm believers in freedom of speech, but that doesn't mean they book Flat Earthers or Moon Landing Deniers to speak at their scientific conventions
S4