To Julie,
I agree wholeheartedly with your reply. I don't think that religion is necessary for morality anymore - however in thinking on this subject after reading peacepipe's post, I have to wonder if morality would have evolved if religion had not.
If man had not ever invented God, would society have evolved its' own morality or would the golden rule be survival of the fittest? With no 'reward' awaiting primitive people after death, would they have been able to achieve anything other than an existence based purely on their own survival, and the survival of those who could help them or better their chances of that survival?
Of course I agree that now we have evolved morality based on the greater good which does not require a God or a heavenly reward, and many of those who live their lives with their 'eye on the prize' as it were, seem to do good only as a means to their own eternal survival, and not necessarily because they want to do good, but rather because they have a fear of the consequences of doing bad.
In essence, I'm wondering if morality may have been born of religion, though it certinly does not require it to survive. And in answer to a question posed by peacepipe, if religion disappeared, yes, morality would continue. If religion had never existed, would morality exist? I don't know.
Just my rather confused thoughts,
Silverleaf