Abbadon,
Very much correct, but you can see the WTBS headlines (and mis quoting) should the UN even "consider" the resolution as attempted by these idiots...
How can you have "Freedom of choice" and a "ban on public display" in the same concept?
when i read this at first and then looked at the web site.
i thought oh no, what have i done.
but now, i'm thinking it was just a matter of time before someone attempted the unachievable.
Abbadon,
Very much correct, but you can see the WTBS headlines (and mis quoting) should the UN even "consider" the resolution as attempted by these idiots...
How can you have "Freedom of choice" and a "ban on public display" in the same concept?
un proposal: i picked up a comment on another site about a supposed resolution that was to be introduced to the un on january 27th, 2004 that would effectively ban religion.
if this is true, then the jw leaders (governing buzzards) and their followers will have a prophetic field day!!!
here is the link to the claim: http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2004/1/emw100794.htm.
ok, I don't think it is the "UN" vs religion, but a group that is trying to get a resolution into the UN for the UN to pass... very different...
See this site:
http://www.formulism.org/news.html
They are attempting to get the UN to pass a resolution banning religion... IMHO, very different than the UN moving on it's own in this regaurd...
and likely rutherford and other top society officer must have known about this event ?
government motion in judges chambers:
this was fascinating, because while the society was allowed many motions, the government only made one motion ?
here are links to all the parts I could find:
Part 1: Trial of JFR et al ->http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/6/21779/272002/post.ashx#272002
Part 2a: JFR Trial – Judges Chambers ->http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/6/21928/1.ashx
Part 2b: JFR Trial – Judges Chambers - C...->http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/6/21933/273916/post.ashx#273916
Part 2c: JFR Trial - Judges Chambers ->http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/6/22209/277770/post.ashx#277770
Part 2d: JFR Trial – Judges Chambers ->http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/6/22374/279676/post.ashx#279676
Part 3: JFR Trial – The Indictment (Good) ->http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/6/22443/280672/post.ashx#280672
Part 4a: JFR Trial – Jury Selection ->http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/6/22632/283234/post.ashx#283234
Part 4b: JFR Trial - Jury Selection (Cont'd) -> http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/6/22744/284544/post.ashx#284544
Part 4c: JFR Trial ... Criticizing the Government ->http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/6/22809/285446/post.ashx#285446
Part 4d: JFR Trial – The Surprise ->http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/6/22870/286351/post.ashx#286351
Part 5a: JFR Trial – 1st Witness -> http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/6/22968/287769/post.ashx#287769
(I couldn't find anything beyond that)
and likely rutherford and other top society officer must have known about this event ?
government motion in judges chambers:
this was fascinating, because while the society was allowed many motions, the government only made one motion ?
Excellent writeup...
I seem to remember that the society did in fact release a copy of the Finished Mystery without the offending pages to appease the government for a time... is that also true? (I even think it is referenced in the Divine Pourpose book)
according to this, jesus is not just the mediator of the 144,000 -- he's the mediator of mankind!!
and apparently "dear jesus" prayers are okay!
the watch tower says i can say, "dear jesus, you are my mediator as you are for all mankind..." "the bible clearly says that jesus christ is mankind's redeemer, so he is mankind's mediator.
I just don't know why every is so adamant in finding mistakes and fault with the organization
Because here, in this forum, people are free to discuss and question the doctorines of the WTBS. More importantly, here members are free to disagree OPENLY with such doctorines.
The WTBS has a long standing history of disfellowshipping people for questioning it's "authority" on doctrines such as this...
And, as others have stated, they brought this scrutiny on themselves by stating that they are "God's Spokesperson"... if that were the case, then doctrines, such as this one, should not change over the course of time... this would, IMHO count as one of those "truths" that is not a conciense matter.
Lastly,
Haven't they? I mean no other religion gets more scrutiny. And yet they still stand. Steadily increasing
You would need to check the records for the "Steadily Increasing" part. I think if you honestly look at it, they are "barely holding on" and are largely decreasing.
But largely they ignore the external scrutiny, and primarily they completely silence all internal scrutiny, this is not, IMHO, "standing up to scrutiny"... Ignoring it or silencing it is not the answer.
according to this, jesus is not just the mediator of the 144,000 -- he's the mediator of mankind!!
and apparently "dear jesus" prayers are okay!
the watch tower says i can say, "dear jesus, you are my mediator as you are for all mankind..." "the bible clearly says that jesus christ is mankind's redeemer, so he is mankind's mediator.
But there is a more recent quote that specifically states that Jesus is not the mediator for all mankind, correct?
If so, wouldn't this be a more impressive bit of new vs. old light? Especially considering that htey "realized" the seperate classes (annointed vs. other sheep) in 1935?
from awake!, january 22, 2004, pages 19-23.. "why i believe the bible - a nuclear scientist tells his story".
read how a nuclear physicist reconciled his knowledge of science with his belief in the bible.. -- page 19. .
why i believe the bible.
Am I the only one who caught this:
I was ordained as a minister of Jehovah's Witnesses
Unless a lot has changed, this is a rather strange thing for a witness to say...
Perhaps this particular "Nuclear Scientist" has decided to use a pseudonym to protect his true identity of "Homer J. Simpson".
.
well my weekly bible study is coming up this week and i am being blessed with the cuircut servant and his wife.i was told last week to save all my questions for them,(beacause of my difficulty with believing in 1914).
does anyone have a question that they would like me to ask.. .
"Have you been visiting Apostate Internet Sites? "
you'll have to ask them to prove that the Internet is explicitly forbidden in scripture, and have them prove what an "apostate" is...
.
well my weekly bible study is coming up this week and i am being blessed with the cuircut servant and his wife.i was told last week to save all my questions for them,(beacause of my difficulty with believing in 1914).
does anyone have a question that they would like me to ask.. .
There are so many questions you can ask them... but you have to be prepared with your reply for thier answer...they do seem to have an answer for everything...
As for 1914, ask them:
1. how they arrived at that date for Christ's return.
2. Was it the original date for Christ's return?
3. Has the teaching(s) regaurding what would happen upon Christ's return ever changed?
4. If the WTBS is led by "Holy Spirit", why do certain teachings need updating? (Millions Now Living Will Never Die, the return of the saints in 1925, etc...)
5. Would the Studies In Scriptures be a good set of books to own/study? After all, this is what the Organization believed/preached up until 1916.
6. has the Organization ever updated text in existing publications in order to hide/change an existing teaching?
i bought my copy yesterday.
i liked the movie in theater, cant wait till the weekend to pop it into the dvd player.
i like scary movies, missed out on a lot of them while in the borg.
I just watched American Psycho 2... very funny movie....