Let's take a look at what the WTBTS writes about the FDS and the authorship of doctrinal articles.
1) It has been repeated many times in the WTBTS literature that only the FDS/anointed are capable of providing "spiritual food in due season". Therefore, none of the non-FDS should be writing doctrinal articles. Yet not everyone in the writing department is anointed.
2) The figure of 99.8 percent of non-participation is accurate (and has been higher in the past) given that it is calculated from the partaker statistics vs. the total membership of the anointed in the writing department and the governing body.
3) There is no evidence of a single doctrinal article appearing that did not originate with the writing department or the governing body.
4) Most, perhaps over 75 percent, of the anointed are female. Yet females are not permitted to write doctrinal articles. How can the FDS as a class be said to provide "spiritual food" when more than half of them are required to stay silent?
5) News reports and general interest articles that are not doctinal in nature and so are excluded from the definition of "spiritual food"; it doesn't matter who writes these.
6) The WTBTS is now run by a non-anointed president and does not have a legal obligation to follow governing body or other anointed direction. They will print whatever they feel like printing.
In view of this and other evidence, it is clear that:
1) It is false that there is now, or ever has been, any significant contribution or direction from the great majority of the anointed class.
2) The WTBTS FDS doctrine is nothing but a fantasy used by Brooklyn to justify itself and its policies.