Let me clarify once and for all my logic:
(and I apologize to Joseph for distorting the primary arguement of this tread! I will be more considerate next time!)
Since there undoubtedly, without arguement!, remains knowledge yet to be discovered, it be true that we have not yet conceived all there is to conceive. Now, since we have not yet conceived all there is to conceive, we can not without a doubt say that "what we can not conceive does not exist."
Imagine the epiphany if we, humanity, one day arose as said "what we can not conceive does not exist"?
Humanity is habitually seeking what we cannot conceive!
Our limited conceptions, then, do not permit an unbiased, without a doubt, disproving of God nor the Easter Bunny. This may sound completely irrational, but it is ultimately rational.
Now, if it be true that God and the Easter Bunny could exist, then the burden is upon "conscious" reverence of our conceptions.