So a scientist advances a theory. It's torn to shreds by his peers, not just of its inaccuracy, but for its faulty methodology.
The data since early 2020 has not followed the model suggested by the theory, providing further disconfirmation,
Die Glaubwürdigkeit von Herrn Wodarg ist jetzt ernsthaft geschädigt...
Was your intention to highlight the difference between how science works and how religion works?