::: non: Your argument does not apply to non. Non does not use this line of reasoning. God could be triune even though the word does not appear in the bible. The concept might appear. But it does not and so God is not--trias.
:: suck: Actually, it does. Since to a catholic, the concept of a holy trinity does indeed appear, and is therefore supported in scripture, a catholic could use the very words that 'non' has muttered, in a slightly modified form of course, to essentially say what 'non' has said. Which is, absolutely nothing of consequence.
: non: A catholic can say whatever she wants to say. It dont mean it is so. Non believes that the concept of trinity does not appear in the bible. He does not use the line of reasoning with catholics that you accused him of. You were just wrong about that.
Actualy non does indeed use the same line of reasoning, because non believes that an organization is as clearly demonstrated in the scriptures as a catholic believes that a holy trinity is demonstrated in the scriptures. Therefore you both make the same mistake because neither a trinity nor an organization is clearly defined in scripture.
: non: Trinity concept not appear in bible. It is just like that.
Organization concept not appear in bible anymore than a holy trinity. It is just like that.