Amidst this very good and thorough discussion, mP wrote:
"........tye bookmof daniel has been shown by scholars not to be prophetciic but a rant in code against a ruler taht the jews really hated, antiochus iv. the same style of writing was used in revelation which is about nero who is the beast 666. xians dont want to accept this so they start inventing all sorts of wonderful stories, all of which are wrong. all armageddon predictions are wrong because rev and dan are not filled w/ prophecies.
the unfortunate thing is daniel contains anacharisms and historical errors. i will list but a few. (.......................)
-he gives the wrong location for antiochus death, dan says he will die east of the jordan while he doed west, or vice versa. i can t recall the exact details but he got a fifty fifty guess wrong."
Now THAT is what I call really SERIOUS scholarship! He will list "but a few", resulting in his listing two, and as for this last one it is "...or vice versa". He cannot "recall the exact details."
I am happy that kepler and anno'maly keep this discussion going at a somewhat different level.