Great thoughts, Billy. . . . . . .
Here are some of my approaches:
There's a certain quiver in the voice when the emotions are so connected to what we're expressing. You can hear and feel the emotion in the voice of a religious fundamentalist when they call in to a radio talk show. I know I felt that same emotion well up when, as a JW, I dealt with criticism or mockery. I tried to suppress it then and have gotten much better at it now. Discussing religion dispassionately like most any other topic is a huge advantage. The lack of emotion also makes for clearer thinking, more reasoned, thoughtful responses.
Not being opinionated or dogmatic on things that do not matter, always being the "reasonable" one, makes it difficult for a frothing-at-the-mouth apostate label to stick.
I also join in discussions about the nuts and bolts of being a JW. . . and the memories of good people. It's not like I've amputated that part of my heritage. Having been a JW is a big part of who I am today, adding certain skills and eliminating many normal opportunities. I don't view those types of discussions as a compromise. If it leads a relative to ask if I would ever consider going back, I can just smile and say "oh, no." The discussion stops there, but they know I have my reasons and they must be good ones, based on how I carry myself.
tms