Mindfield
Why can you say the pagan origins of the date December 25th is crucial in determining whether is should be celebrated or not and still accept marriage with its wedding ring, which also had pagan origins? Both marriage and the birth of Jesus have their importance... what makes you selectively take one but ignore the other? Isn't the fact that Christmas no longer has resemblances to its pagan roots makes it acceptable now?
First off, Mindfield, the subject of this thread is about "
Christmas Tree Pictures", which has to do with the Christmas celebration. It's NOT about weddings. But, that be as it may, a “wedding ring” is a
sign that the one wearing it is “taken” … an outward indication for all to see that the person already belongs to another. Of course there’s no end to the number of things that a MIND like yours, MINDFIELD, can think up, which you imagine to be inconsistent with the JWs stand in one way or another. For example: Tin cans are of pagan origin. Automobiles are too. Computers as well. We Christians use a heck of a lot of things which are the handiwork of “pagans”, right? Right! According to YOUR logic, JWs shouldn’t have a car, a computer, a wedding ring, etc., etc.
A wedding ring is much like a marriage certificate, which is ALSO of pagan origin. Right? Right! Why do JWs go to the trouble to obtain a legal, pagan Marriage Certificate? For the same reason they might wish to wear a pagan wedding band. To use something such as the wedding ring for the purpose I’ve described is one thing. To indulge in a pagan celebration/festivity or even copy from it is quite another … PARTICULARLY when it centers around something as important as the Savior of the world, the Messiah.
So when it comes to the “Christmas” celebration, it’s not only the pagan *date* that figures in on the issue.
Yadirf
Daniel 11:35 ... a KEY prophecy that must be fulfilled before the "time of the end" gets underway.