Those who lobby to protect the second amendment are purely silly when they try to say it means "only rifles or only shotguns but not handguns".
Arms are arms and include weapons such as rifles, shotguns, handguns, nuclear warheads, f15 fighters, nuclear subs.
It is the lack of candor and propensity for bullshiznit that keeps the debate going. Its plain and simple: if we keep the amendment allow ALL arms (aka weapons)....else lets toss the silly thing (which I am in favor of) and allow local law for each community to be the rule of the day. Of all the amendments I find the second to be the most indefensible when we try and add constraints that quite simply in the constitution.
God I hate lawyers!!!
Donkey