Took some time to read the Charity Commission Report and other posts on this. Does this mean that any of abuse or financial fraus cases involving an elder/min servant/officer who comes into contact with vulnerable members of the cong, needs now reporting to the Chrities Commission? If so I hope they take on extra staff.
To have to report such matters to an outside body ( and one with very wide ranging powers) must have sent a shudder down the spines (???) of the elite in Mill Hill. I am writing to the CC to ask them if they would confirm if this is the case. Most of these instances in the past have been subject only to the closed secret process of the Judicial Committee, now the congs would seem to need to explain how the situation happened.
Also - in this report the Charity Commission insist (not recommend) that Michael Porter NEVER be appointed as an elder/trustee - presumably this applies to all abusers - will any who have been allowed back after "serving time" out of the elder team, now have to stand down.
WT Policy is that abusers CAN regain privileges after many years, this seems to clearly (and rightly) say NO - once an abuser they position of trust has gone forever.
I am also asking the Charity Commission if they will clarify the position re notifying the congregations as to WHY a person is removed - "supervising" them as the WT has said is to happen to Michael Porter is a waste of time (HOW will it happen??) and when they move on, if no major press scandal, who in a new congregation would know of the dangers of allowing such a person to be in a position endangering anyone young or old.
Congregations need specific warning about the likes of Porter just as much as they might be warned about the dangers of crossing the road - if only the elite are in knowledge of the dangers posed how can others be safeguarded - experience says thay cannot.
If Porter was "repentant" then in WT speak he is clan and a fit and proper person - in my book he is a real and present danger and always will be
Sadly he is not the only one of this sort in the WT.............