it is saturday morning and you hear a ring at the door bell, two men greet you looking quite swell.
they say good morning and open up their publications and start reading without any hesitation.
they tell you the world is getting worse, with death and human suffering you think the world must be cursed!
Um, just because phrases and sentences end with words that rhyme doesn't meant it's poetry.
Try working on your meter and rhythm.
Also, great poetry comes from great subjects. As fun as it is, ridiculing JWs is not a great subject.
I suggest you get a collection of great poetry and read it out loud.
I recommend this to get you started:
this is how i look at the regional conventions with the video monitors.
same crappy content just a little different delivery.
this is a bizarre story.. there is a woman who is the local leader of the naacp who is obviously trying to mislead people into believing she is black who is actually white.
very white.. she obviously gets a tan regularly but looks more orange.
yes, orange really is the new black!.
LUHE: why can't this woman be black - what kind of corrective surgery would achieve this?
Black is a culture, not a genital.
interesting theory i thought on stephen lett.
if anything i would of thought tomo3 would of caused them more grief with his comments.. http://insidethewatchtower.com/governing-body/stephen-lett-dumped-from-governing-body/.
John Hoyle wrote: "But within the past few weeks, Stephen Lett seems to have become the true looney, the master clown, the odd man out of the current Governing Body."
This is NOT a recent development. Lett has always been a fool.
He is more responsible than any other person for my beginning to realize this religion is false.
Back in the early years of this century he would give talks at our District Conventions. I could not stand to watch him because his style of delivery and mannerisms were just an embarrassment.
My wife at the time would chastise me for not watching his talks, "You're being disrespectful to the anointed of Jehovah!" she would say.
I would respond, "Look at him. He's a clown. I can't stand to watch him!" Even though she didn't like what I was saying, she couldn't disagree.
His buffoonery were instrumental in my realizing that there was no way in hell that any god would choose THAT GUY to represent him.
That was one of the first loose threads for me. Once I started to pull on it and a few more, the whole thing began to unravel.
this is a bizarre story.. there is a woman who is the local leader of the naacp who is obviously trying to mislead people into believing she is black who is actually white.
very white.. she obviously gets a tan regularly but looks more orange.
yes, orange really is the new black!.
Hey, if Bruce Jenner can be a woman, then why can't this woman be black.
Apparently she was raised this in a racially diverse/mixed environment and self-identifies as black.
What's the big deal?
i would think that a lot of resentment is building up for these for these guys at bethel even though it may not be discussed openly for fear of being abused by the gb in some way.. any way looking at their personality and the extreme phoniness of rubber mouth/face lett, and am#3, and the chicken shit coward leosch who won't even show up in court when subpoena'd to defend his faith or policies, and i'm sure they have many more undesirable traits that repel people instead of attract and that has to work its toll on relationships they have at bethel.. and this shunning thing i'm sure must really erk some at god's house and while they may not be free to voice their discontent i feel it must be building because these guys are complete nincompoops when it come to reality and the only way they know how to give direction is with fear and guilt which i'm sure is rubbing a lot of people the wrong way.. and let not forget the issues that are raise when they stole all the congregations savings and the pledge drive for more cash, ban on higher education, lawsuit pay out and etc.... what is this doing to the relation ship they have with legal and accounting i see trouble brewing right thier in the spiritual pair of dice..
BrokebackWatchtower, I also wonder about the amount of self loathing that goes on in the unconscious of each GB member
Although, Jung’s work has made some contributions to mainstream psychology, generally modern psychologists do not employ his ideas into their theories of personality and mind. In particular, they do not give much credence to his theory of archetypes.
Ernest Jones (Freud’s biographer) wrote that Jung “descended into a pseudo-philosophy out of which he never emerged” and to many his ideas look more like New Age mystical speculation than a scientific contribution to psychology.
You might find this article written by Saul McLeod informative:
"theism" here means "belief in a god" or "the worldview that an intelligent designer created the universe and life.
" ("god" here means a being with a mind who initiated and/or wound-up the universe, and designed life on earth)the most common claim that i see atheists making on twitter, is that "no evidence" exists in support of belief in a god.this post will remove any excuse atheists have for claiming "no evidence exists" in support of an initiator.
atheists can still reject this evidence as "weak," but they cannot truthfully say it does not exist.now, it is true that we do not have "observable, repeatable, falsifiable, empirical, scientific" evidence conclusively proving that an initiator exists, but we do have many lines of philisophical, experiential, and logical evidence.and... here... we... go:1:) many leading scientists, including stephen hawking, say that the space-time-matter universe had a beginning at the singularity/big bang.
StrongHaiku, well said.
Hell, it's all beliefs. The only thing that any of us can really know is that we exist. After that, it's all guesswork. We could be completely wrong about many, most, maybe even all of what we believe about our own existence.
I'm just sayin' is all.
it looks to me like the society is rapidly moving back to the february 2008 watchtower "new light" on "this generation," which said this:.
* jesus used "this generation" to mean "anointed ones.".
* in the first fulfillment, jesus was promising that some anointed ones would still be alive to witness the events of 70 c.e.. * in the secondary fulfillment, jesus was promising that some anointed ones would still be alive when jesus returns to judge the sheep and goats.. the new 2015 jw research guide posted on jw.org lists this 2008 watchtower article as the first article people should read about the "clarified understanding" of the generation.. this 2008 view also matches the statement in the new 2015 jesus--the way, the truth, the life book, which says that "this generation" refers to disciples who see the signs of the last days.. i think they are abandoning the overlapping part..
Hey guys, quit trying to make sense outta' nonsense!
It'll never work.
thought this had to be made.
Londo and WTF, thanks for the clarification!
Do you have a page number?
thought this had to be made.
WTF, when and where did Stephen Hassan make the statement you quoted?
Combating Cult Mind Control was published in 1988 and--as far as I can remember--Hassan did not mention JWs explicitly in that book.
