http://www.e-watchman.com/discussion/
that's the link.
you all better get right on over there now and register.
meg·a·lo·ma·ni·a 1. A psychopathological condition in which delusional fantasies of wealth, power, or omnipotence predominate. 2. An obsession with grandiose or extravagant things or actions.
Wow, big word, but yep, that's the condition that he is suffering from alright. A real "sicko," but not half as hard to spell. LOL "An obsession with grandiose things" ... I could go into some detail regarding how well this describes e-watchman, but words fail me at the moment.
http://www.e-watchman.com/discussion/
that's the link.
you all better get right on over there now and register.
Corvin,
Watchman said to you:
Yet, all of the participants on this forum are either active Jehovah's Witnesses or otherwise supportive of the faith. It seems you are in the wrong forum!While having said that to you, he undoubtedly would claim he was in the RIGHT forum all the while he was creating those 2000-plus posts of his here at JWD. Like I've already said, he's a damn hypocrite.
http://www.e-watchman.com/discussion/
that's the link.
you all better get right on over there now and register.
Corvin
That animation you posted is a fit representation of those whom "Pastor E-Watchman" has brainwashed. Don't you just love the way the guy's hands move in sync with his brain going up and down on that rub board? LOL
Schizm
http://www.e-watchman.com/discussion/
that's the link.
you all better get right on over there now and register.
Corvin,
Thanks for going over there and confronting them with that "4th" question. It's doubtful though that any of them will get the sense of it, since the only thing they have eyes for right now is their illustrious Pastor, Mr. E-Watchman. He's their hero, don't ya know, and by golly nobody had better try to touch him. I noticed too that he didn't dare attempt to deny being a long-time poster here at JWD. Wow, if only his admirers over there could read some of the posts he's made here, as well as be made aware of all his past failed predictions, then *perhaps* their jaws might then fall open from shock. At least they wouldn't be so quick to place faith in his NEW predictions.
Schizm
http://www.e-watchman.com/discussion/
that's the link.
you all better get right on over there now and register.
Valis,
I'm not sure why you want to go mess w/watchman's business.
Because he's a damn hypocrite, that's why!
Schizm
according to the dubs, and other faiths, adam was created with no defects of any kind.
he was created with no sin.
then adam sinned.
Puternut,
I gather from that, that Adam was created with a perfect body, but didn't have eternal life in him, UNTIL he passed the test.
I think that the more correct way to think of it is like this: Adam would have lived for as long as he was allowed to partake of the tree of life. He was already partaking of the life-sustaining tree of life, regularly, as I've already established up above. Can it rightfully be said that Adam once had "eternal" life? Yes, I think so, but it was based on a *condition* ... the condition that he remain obedient to his Creator. Likewise, even those who succeed in passing the test at the end of the 1000-year reign of Christ will have "eternal" life (life not threatened by death due to old age), but their continued existence will always depend upon them remaining obedient to their Creator. In other words, "eternal" life is nothing more than continuous life that has no end ... UNLESS the person were to at some point lose his love of righteousness and therefore become disqualified for any further opportunity at life.
So, perhaps one was poisonous, and the other had properties in it that would allow him to live eternally.
I concur with what you say about the tree of life, but I don't believe it's necessary to think that the *other* tree's fruit was poisonous. Of course there are person's who would argue that if we assume that the one tree had life-sustaining properties in it, then to be consistent the *other* tree had to have something in its fruit that would bring on death. But, does this necessarily have to be the case? Is it not possible that the *other* tree, although a real tree, was simply placed there for the purpose of representing Adam's not being worthy of life if he ate from it?
But why god would 'test' his creation, is puzzeling.
It's a simple thing, really. There's nothing more precious than the gift of life. "Eternal" life should not be the possession of any who do not qualify for it. Would you really want to live forever in a universe that was inhabited by people who practice vile things? Those who aren't able to pass the "test" simply won't be allowed to live any longer. Though sad in a way, it's a necessary thing.
The 'tree of knowledge of good and bad', was right in the middle of the garden. And they would walk by it daily to gather other fruits. It's like telling someone you cannot do something, and holding the temptation right in front of your nose. That is something that doesn't do well with me. Any father would not do that to his children.
Personally, I would say that a Creator that would NOT require obedience from his children would be an incompetent God. It's God's purpose to have peace and tranquillity flourish throughout the universe of his making, and it's simply not possible for that to happen unless those who will inhabit that universe are WILLING to practice what is right.
What exactly changed in Adam, I don't know. All I can think of is DNA structure changes.
Absolutely nothing changed in Adam, other than the fact that his body began to degenerate due to his being shut off from having the life-sustaining fruit from the tree of life. Without the ingredients of that fruit, Adam would begin to "die".
Schizm
http://www.e-watchman.com/discussion/
that's the link.
you all better get right on over there now and register.
Corvin,
You went and registered! Great!!! ROFLMAO! Those three questions you placed before them over there were really good ones. What would have made an excellent 4th question, is this: "Are any of you aware of the fact that the owner of e-watchman has accrued over 2000 posts to his name over at the JWD (apostate) forum?"
Please be careful over there, Corvin, unless you're the owner of an extremely tall pair of boots.
Schizm
as many of you likely know, the owner of the e-watchman website constantly charges the wts with having committed spiritual fornication with the united nations organization (the so-called ngo affair).
i would like to ask you all a question in order to find out your opinion as to whether or not watchman has done a near equivalent thing that he charges the wts with having done.
most of you were probably aware that watchman once advertised the e-watchman site on this site here (jw.com).
Rev
You asked if this is a joke? I'm inclined to think so ... NOW. Are you by any chance related to the Most Right Reverand?
http://www.e-watchman.com/discussion/
that's the link.
you all better get right on over there now and register.
Stephanie,
Ouch! You took me wrong. You apparently haven't been here long enough to know who the owner of that site is. If you had, you'd understand why I called attention to his forum "here".
Schizm
http://www.e-watchman.com/discussion/
that's the link.
you all better get right on over there now and register.
Message from administrator of e-watchman:
While the site owner will do his best to monitor and moderate the Discussion Board, it will still require a keen eye on the part of the friends to make sure that "all things take place decently and by arrangement." (1 Corinthians 14:40)
This is necessary because there will be those who want to ruin this place of interaction with their anti-Witness slander and gossip which serves little purpose apart from tearing down our faith. We must be on our guard against such ones, and each person has a responsibility to do so.
If someone is posting in a manner inconsistent with the goals of the e-watchman website (which is to encourage the brothers and sisters to stand firm and yet be alert to Jehovah's judgments), or is resorting to apostate tactics, please REPORT that post immediately so that it comes to the attention of the site owner. You can do so via email or through the Report a Thread option. http://e-watchman.com/discussion/index.php?s=cb60daddec8584a8183ecc9bd50230ca&showtopic=33
Be nice, folks. Otherwise they'll boot your butt right outa there.
