Posts by robhic

25

Need Input on DF committee hearings, please

by robhic in

i would like to ask, specifically, the ladies here who have been subjected to a jc hearing, preferrably for fairly serious reasons, to write a quick summary of the humiliation, etc.

that went on during this process.

anybody who has participated in a jc hearing is welcome to add.

robhic

I would like to ask, specifically, the ladies here who have been subjected to a JC hearing, preferrably for fairly serious reasons, to write a quick summary of the humiliation, etc. that went on during this process. Anybody who has participated in a JC hearing is welcome to add. No specifics are needed if you don't feel comfortable writing about anything you can just give a general rundown on how lecherous and un-godlike the committee treated you. This is my reason for asking:

My JW g/f keeps saying that she has to confess to the elders regarding some sexual indiscretions we have committed over the past, now, almost 3-4 years. Yes, I know this sounds like the girl ain't right in the head (and for medical reasons she is prone to some mental fuzziness...) but I keep trying to persuade her to not do this.

I've told her that if jehovah knows all then he knows what she has done. What need is there to involve middlemen, who are just that -- middleMEN -- in something involving her and jehovah ultimately.

I thought that maybe if I could give her some people's experiences of the dehumanizing, degrading, sleazy and downright awful stuff that goes on in those meetings between the elders (I've often seen described as horny, sleazy old men) and a vulnerable, emotional and violated woman/girl maybe she would see how this process is such a draconian and one-sided affair.

Without giving away any sensitive details or anything, could some of you give me a rundown on a particularly vile JC hearing you were subjected to so I can print it out for my g/f to read? Her congregation seems like a reasonably laid-back bunch and I don't get the feeling they would really be a super-bad, "Spanish Inquisition" type but I'd like to maybe preview for her what is in store should she choose to confess.

Can anybody help me? I also tried at another site but only got limited responses. I would appreciate it immensely because I really don't want to think of her going thru this.

Thanks for any and all input. I sincerely appreciate it,

Robert

13

Do not become unevenly yoked with an unbeliever unless she is asian.

by XQsThaiPoes in

i notice a few "brothers" with asian non -jw wives.

many tend to be at least 10-30 years younger often second wives.

i notice the "friends" don't tend to pick on their budist,shinto, etc wives to convert them to jws.

robhic

17 In a few cases, the unbeliever eventually became a Christian. However, marriages to unbelievers have often proved disastrous. Those unevenly yoked do not share the same beliefs, standards, or goals. (2 Corinthians 6:14

Well, it says "often" not "every time" and that's also not exactly what the scritpure quoted says:

2Co 6:14 Be not unequally yoked with unbelievers: for what fellowship have righteousness and iniquity? or what communion hath light with darkness? Looks more like keeping unrighteous (foreigners? UNbelievers?) from ones considered righteous.

And Deuteronomy 22:10-14 also gives the Israelites the green light to take non-Israelite women who are "pleasing to his eye" as a wife (or concubine, I guess) should the mood strike you after slaughtering all the rest of the community. Mighty nice of them.

I guess after a long day of genocide, pillaging and stealing it's nice to have some "strange" to relax with.

Robert

12

Similarities!

by Voyager in

good moring everyone:.

i had just thought briefly, that if american soldiers are to receive court martial, or some kind of discipline for (smiling) or giving the (thumbs up) over the deaths of iraq prisoners and victims--then perhaps jehovah's witnesses who give the very same (smiles) and approval of death victims, should likewise be disciplined as well.. look at these similarities.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6217.htm .

robhic

I have a T-shirt my daughter gave me some years ago because she thought it summed up my attitude in a joking way (neither one of us are JWs). It says "Some people are alive just because it's against the law to kill them!" It was a joke.

It was amusing but after seeing this comparison and especially the compilation of pictures of smiling sheeple prancing off into (what they think is) paradise while their friends and families who aren't JWs are horribly slaughtered is chilling. Do you think the day may come when they'll no longer wear the suits and dresses and just outfit the ones in service with similar garb? Something to sum up their feeling about the other 99.9% of humanity?

It freaks me out ... and then it pisses me off.

Robert

15

Tubal pregnancy.....here's a mind-boggler......

by goddess_baal in

.

i always wondered (even when i was still in the organization), but never had the guts to ask.. if a woman becomes pregnant, but the egg has implanted in the falopian tube....will the jw's condone an abortion to save the life of the mother?

or does it boil down to their usual pansy-ass, "matter of conscience" excuse.

robhic

Illustrating that such dangers must be viewed as still only possibilities is the case of a woman in South Africa. Before she was aware of her pregnancy she received an injection for a kidney ailment. Later her doctor said that, as a result, her child would be either an imbecile or horribly deformed; he urged her to have an abortion. When she learned from Jehovah?s witnesses what the Bible says about respect for life, she declined the abortion.

Hmm, sounds self-serving to me. Like the WT recognized that an imbecile baby would have some future potential as a member of the GB or could write articles to be printed in the WT magazines! Yep, sounds self-serving to me...

I suppose the child care facilities supplied by the WTS would be utilized .... oh, that's right, they don't have any. Nevermind.

Robert

4

9/11 Bombings -- WTS reaction.

by robhic in

i was recently told how wonderfully the wts reacted to the people working at the wtc site in new york after 9/11/01.

not just bringing food and water etc.

to the firemen and other workers but actually "giving love" by hugging the workers, (i'm sure) giving out magazines and acting all superior because of the real love shown instead of the superficial kind shown by the churches of christnedom.

robhic

Thanks to all for the info, especially Blondie for those links. Either I did my searches in the wrong sections or my computer skills are really slipping! I checked all the links Blondie supplied and did find "Patriot's" posts informative.

However, I do seem to remember something about WTS buildings having the doors locked so people couldn't get in to seek refuge from the calamity taking place and other such accounts. Am I mistaken? The false claims as to being actually in Ground Zero seemed like the same old SOP for WT propaganda. I think perimeter seems likely but as Patriot pointed out, being on the actual site is wishful thinking unless the JW involved was a worker with permission to be there.

Thanks again to all who responded.

Robert

4

9/11 Bombings -- WTS reaction.

by robhic in

i was recently told how wonderfully the wts reacted to the people working at the wtc site in new york after 9/11/01.

not just bringing food and water etc.

to the firemen and other workers but actually "giving love" by hugging the workers, (i'm sure) giving out magazines and acting all superior because of the real love shown instead of the superficial kind shown by the churches of christnedom.

robhic

I was recently told how wonderfully the WTS reacted to the people working at the WTC site in New York after 9/11/01. Not just bringing food and water etc. to the firemen and other workers but actually "giving love" by hugging the workers, (I'm sure) giving out magazines and acting all superior because of the real love shown instead of the superficial kind shown by the churches of christnedom. I was told how well and warmly received the WTS response was from those working at the Trade Center site. (Yeah, who needed food and water when WT and Awake! magazines were available?)

I tried a search to find information here but was unsuccessful. I seem to remember a few horror stories of WTS behavior on 9/11 such as locking their doors to prevent people running away from entering their building(s) and being generally apathetic to the situation -- unless a JW was involved. Can anyone point me to some information or provide it from first-hand experience? Am I mistaken?

I am really curious at the spin that seems to be being put on their reprehensible actions now to make it seem like they were the only ones really doing anything at that tragic site.Thanks,

Robert

3

Ironic current or recent WT magazine cover?

by robhic in

i recently caught sight of a wt magazine at my jw girlfriend's house.

i didn't want to ask her if i could look at it (no sense opening that door!

) but the cover was titled "religion -- the root of mankind's problems?

robhic

When this WT prophecy is fulfilled the UN will 'outlaw' all religion with 'extreme violence'. To quote the WT, they will 'burn her with fire'.

Yeah, like the UN could do anything of the sort! They can't find their ass with both hands! If the UN is such an entity to be feared I don't really think we as a population have a thing to worry about.

Of course, I thought the wanton and complete destruction of all the world's religions was supposed to have happened already...

Robert

12

Watchtower?s Booklet "Should your believe in the Trinity?" EXPOSED

by Tyre in

robhic

Two more interesting sites:

http://www.towertotruth.net/ShouldYouBelieveintheTrinity.htm

http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Parthenon/7831/booklet1.html

Robert

3

Ironic current or recent WT magazine cover?

by robhic in

i recently caught sight of a wt magazine at my jw girlfriend's house.

i didn't want to ask her if i could look at it (no sense opening that door!

) but the cover was titled "religion -- the root of mankind's problems?

robhic

I recently caught sight of a WT magazine at my JW girlfriend's house. I didn't want to ask her if I could look at it (no sense opening that door!) but the cover was titled "Religion -- the root of mankind's problems?" I thought the simple, obvious answer was "You betcha!" but I imagine they wouldn't indict themselves (at least not intentionally) in their own publication.

Has anyone seen or have access to this WT? It is a deep blue with those words (above) on the cover. I'd be curious at just who they are taking aim at in the article. I'm betting catholics but who can be sure?

I am guessing it is the current WT (don't remember seeing it before) or it could just be a recent one. Anybody know? Thanks,

Robert

14

What would you ask?

by Gadget in

if you found a db with a section entitled 'ask a jehovahs witness' for people with questions about what jws believe, what question would you ask them?

robhic

I'd like them to back up with some proof (other than the scriptures cited) a few of these stated beliefs as taken from the official WTS website:

Christ died on a stake, not a cross Gal. 3:13; Acts 5:30

Those scriptures say "tree" specifically but they conveniently don't cite all the verses containing the words "cross" or "crucify."

Christ was raised from the dead as an immortal spirit person 1 Pet. 3:18; Rom. 6:9; Rev. 1:17, 18

What about the verses where he invites the apostles to touch him and also asks if it is not he (Jesus) in the flesh? Why would a spirit creature eat a meal with his apostles? What does a spirit eat?

We are now in the 'time of the end' Matt. 24:3-14; 2 Tim. 3:1-5; Luke 17:26-30

Proof please. And something specific, because the WT has printed an admittance that earthquakes haven't really increased.

Earth will never be destroyed or depopulated Eccl. 1:4; Isa. 45:18; Ps. 78:69

What about all the verses talking about the earth melting, not lasting forever and/or being destroyed and such?

Only a little flock of 144,000 go to heaven and rule with Christ Luke 12:32; Rev. 14:1, 3; 1 Cor. 15:40-53; Rev. 5:9, 10

What about the great crowd standing before god ... and all the while him being in heaven?

The 144,000 are born again as spiritual sons of God 1 Pet. 1:23; John 3:3; Rev. 7:3, 4

But why do they have to literally be male, Jewish virgins? (We are being literal, aren't we...?)

A Christian ought to have no part in interfaith movements 2 Cor. 6:14-17; 11:13-15; Gal. 5:9; Deut. 7:1-5

What defines interfaith? Any other belief and JW? Who gets to define interfaith?

Taking blood into body through mouth or veins violates God's laws Gen. 9:3, 4; Lev. 17:14; Acts 15:28, 29

Eating is the only action stated. Transfusions aren't mentioned. And what about blood fractions?

A clergy class and special titles are improper Matt. 23:8-12; 20:25-27; Job 32:21, 22

Cool, what about "Governing Body," District Overseer," "Publisher," "Pioneer" (this ain't no cowboy movie! ), etc.?

Yep, I'd be curious to hear a couple of explanations -- complete with proof -- of those babies!

Robert