Yeah - just watched part of My Fair Lady today actually. I get a real bang out of the "Why Can't a Woman Be More Like a Man" routine. LOL And it struck me that in a remake, Kelsey Grammer (Frazier Crane - Do you even have Frazier in England?) would make a PERFECT Henry Higgins.
3acrewood
JoinedPosts by 3acrewood
-
51
Movies You Watch Over & Over & Over
by 3acrewood inhave you noticed there are certain movies you just never get tired of watching?
what's does your list include?
here are some of mine (in no particular order as to favorites):.
-
-
-
37
What is an Amicus Brief
by 3acrewood inhi, waiting, and all others concerned about this amicus brief:.
just to set the record straight - i have been a legal secretary for over 20 years, and i assure you there is nothing shady about the society filing an amicus brief in regard to this swaggart thing.
an amicus brief is filed in cases in which the verdict could set a precedent that would or could have an adverse affect on other parties not involved in the suit (i.e., other religious organizations, corporations, etc.).
-
-
3acrewood
Spec: Concerning your post above - something about "taking it to the congregation ...?
There's a line in Joe vs. the Volcano (granted, not Oscar material, but one line in it just jumped out at me when I read your post). Meg Ryan plays multiple roles - one of which is the really ditzy sister. At one point, Meg Ryan's main character is having an exchange with this ditzy sister, who suddeny throws some totally off-the-wall remark at her. Meg stands there looking confused for a minute, her mouth hanging open, and finally all she can say is: I don't know how to respond to that ...
That's exactly how I feel about your post ...
I don't know how to respond to that ...
-
100
Preacher Jimmy Swaggart and JW Lawyers
by waiting inin the supreme court of the united states, october tenth, 1988, case no.
88-1374, filed on june 22, 1988, clerk joseph f. spanol, jr.. on that date and file number, the attoreny james m. mccabe,and donald t. ridley, 25 colombia heights, brooklyn, ny 11251 (718)606-4993, attorneys for amicus curiae, watchtower bible and tract society of new york, inc. filed a "friends of the court" brief on the behalf of the famous preacher, jimmy swaggart and his ministries.. why would the watchtower society, direct channel for jehovah's holy spirt, which also godly hates babylon the great, which also christiandom is the largest part, go into the supreme court of the united states and file a legal brief to help jimmy swaggart's ministries in his trial which was case no.
88-1374: jimmy swaggart ministries, appelant vs. board of equalization of california, appeller?.
-
-
3acrewood
Waiting:
I don't doubt at all a lot of what you said because I've lived in some small towns myself in the past. Hope you didn't think I was insulting small towns or calling their people "ignorant", 'cuz I wasn't. It can be quite pleasant in some ways; however, people in small towns seem to know more about each other's business, and the elders in those small congregations seem to have more of a propensity for ... um, shall we say ... imposing their personal opinions ... running the show where it's not their place. They can be very opinionated and there are fewer "checks and balances" (in the way of other mature brothers) to prevent them from going too far. So, I know that some of the things you commented on are probably quite accurate. The Society, however, HAS put a LOT of emphasis on elders NOT imposing their personal opinions and consciences on individuals. Unfortunately, in your case, the brothers don't seem to be taking that counsel to heart!By the way, You mentioned something I almost put on my "Women hate it when ..." list (from another thread) ... Having to have your husband act as an intermediary (for the "little woman") in congregation matters! Not a matter of resenting headship really - but I do have a one-on-one relationship with Jehovah. The elders are to be spiritual shepherds to ALL in the congregation. I should be able to approach them with my problems/needs of a spiritual nature on my own. Enough said.
I too live in the midwest, but not in a small town - We've lived in small towns several times serving where the need is greater. There were very noticeable differences - I must say. Chalk it up to human nature, maybe - but if it is too extreme, the Society would probably want to know about it also.
Hang in there.
CJ
-
51
Movies You Watch Over & Over & Over
by 3acrewood inhave you noticed there are certain movies you just never get tired of watching?
what's does your list include?
here are some of mine (in no particular order as to favorites):.
-
-
3acrewood
Have you noticed there are certain movies you just never get tired of watching? What's does your list include? Here are some of mine (in no particular order as to favorites):
Ferris Bueller's Day Off (ALWAYS makes me laugh)
Dirty Rotten Scoundrels (Ditto)
The Fugitive
Sleepless in Seattle
Trading Places
Groundhog Day
The Net
When Harry Met Sally
Father of the Bride (Steve Martin version)
The Big Chill
American Dreamer -
100
Preacher Jimmy Swaggart and JW Lawyers
by waiting inin the supreme court of the united states, october tenth, 1988, case no.
88-1374, filed on june 22, 1988, clerk joseph f. spanol, jr.. on that date and file number, the attoreny james m. mccabe,and donald t. ridley, 25 colombia heights, brooklyn, ny 11251 (718)606-4993, attorneys for amicus curiae, watchtower bible and tract society of new york, inc. filed a "friends of the court" brief on the behalf of the famous preacher, jimmy swaggart and his ministries.. why would the watchtower society, direct channel for jehovah's holy spirt, which also godly hates babylon the great, which also christiandom is the largest part, go into the supreme court of the united states and file a legal brief to help jimmy swaggart's ministries in his trial which was case no.
88-1374: jimmy swaggart ministries, appelant vs. board of equalization of california, appeller?.
-
-
3acrewood
Good Grief, Waiting. Do you live in a REALLY SMALL TOWN or something? 'Cuz in MY WORLD there are ALWAYS TONS of Witnesses who attend WeightWatchers meetings! (No pun intended!) It's NEVER been questioned by ANYONE - even if held in a church's public facilities, which they're NOT around here, although Overeaters Anonymous meetings are. (Not to mention AA and Al-Anon meetings, which are attended by more Witnesses than you would care to think - WITH the blessings of the elders, if it's a struggle that is known to them.) Even though in a physical "Church building", they are not religious meetings.
I've always bought Girl Scout Cookies - even served them on treat nights after book study with no comments from others other than how they love those Mint ... whatevers ...!
I used to go to an Aerobics class at the Y - sponsored by the Y. The literature does discuss not JOINING the Y, but a fee for equal services (with no name on a membership roll ...) is a matter of conscience. I never made a secret of that either. (My Brother, on the other hand, was reprimanded for serving turkey on Thanksgiving! LOL Go figure!) A lot of it is the "conscience" of the particular body of elders. Sure, that's just plain silly, but if I were going to stumble over something, I'd sure hope it would be something more meaningful than that! LOL
Anyway, I'm guessing either you have (had) one VERY OPINIONATED elder that you've had to deal with, or live in a VERY SMALL TOWN. LOL Am I right?
The moral of the story is - know the scriptural principles involved - KNOW what the Society's feelings are on a matter - exercise your Godly conscience, and ... um, Don't Sweat the Small Stuff ...
PS - Think we need a new heading? We seem to have left Jimmy Swaggart in the dust!
Cj
-
37
What is an Amicus Brief
by 3acrewood inhi, waiting, and all others concerned about this amicus brief:.
just to set the record straight - i have been a legal secretary for over 20 years, and i assure you there is nothing shady about the society filing an amicus brief in regard to this swaggart thing.
an amicus brief is filed in cases in which the verdict could set a precedent that would or could have an adverse affect on other parties not involved in the suit (i.e., other religious organizations, corporations, etc.).
-
-
3acrewood
You're right, of course, Friend. Even as I typed it, I was thinking that word "ALL" was a poor choice, but guess I got lazy about going back for another edit. :) (Guess I secretly hoped it would slip on by unnoticed - I shoulda known better with this group! LOL) Thanks.
-
37
What is an Amicus Brief
by 3acrewood inhi, waiting, and all others concerned about this amicus brief:.
just to set the record straight - i have been a legal secretary for over 20 years, and i assure you there is nothing shady about the society filing an amicus brief in regard to this swaggart thing.
an amicus brief is filed in cases in which the verdict could set a precedent that would or could have an adverse affect on other parties not involved in the suit (i.e., other religious organizations, corporations, etc.).
-
-
3acrewood
P.S. In case, in reading the above, it might be interpreted otherwise, it was intended as a friendly post. You can't read my pleasant smile :) in the words, but it's there. I too find, so far, this forum friendlier and less hostile than ... other forums, and I do hope it stays that way. Much more pleasant to visit! I appreciate all your posts and shared experiences.
I might add just one thing to the above though, and that is that by filing such a Brief, the Society is NOT helping Swaggart in any way. They're just saying "Ditto" to the legal issues raised.
CJ
-
37
What is an Amicus Brief
by 3acrewood inhi, waiting, and all others concerned about this amicus brief:.
just to set the record straight - i have been a legal secretary for over 20 years, and i assure you there is nothing shady about the society filing an amicus brief in regard to this swaggart thing.
an amicus brief is filed in cases in which the verdict could set a precedent that would or could have an adverse affect on other parties not involved in the suit (i.e., other religious organizations, corporations, etc.).
-
-
3acrewood
Hi, Waiting, and all others concerned about this Amicus Brief:
Just to set the record straight - I have been a legal secretary for over 20 years, and I assure you there is nothing shady about the Society filing an Amicus Brief in regard to this Swaggart thing. An Amicus Brief is filed in cases in which the verdict could set a precedent that would or could have an adverse affect on other parties not involved in the suit (i.e., other religious organizations, corporations, etc.). In this case, if the Court should find that Jimmy Swaggart's organization should be taxed, then they can apply that ruling to any number of other religious organizations also, including the Watchtower Society. So, by filing this Brief, they are in NO WAY implying that they are in support of or are "friends of" Jimmy Swaggart, nor are they endorsing his organization or beliefs. What it is saying, and ALL it is saying is: WE TOO OBJECT to this lawsuit for all the reasons stated by the defendant's attorneys, as any decision made against Swaggart's organization stands to do great harm to OUR organization as well.
Clear as mud? Hope it helps some.
CJ
-
61
What should I do?
by Scorpion ini have pioneered for over four years.
i have three children and a wife who at times has severe back problems.
i have worked two jobs just to stay ahead of the bills and provide for my family.
-
-
3acrewood
SC -
It doesn't have to be all or nothing. There are a lot of good publishers out there who are putting in quality time in the field service, but don't feel, for one reason or another, that they can pioneer. Obviously pioneering - for you - with all your other responsibilities - is unrealistic at this point. It's hurting you and your family, and you couldn't possibly be finding any joy in it! Cutting back will allow you that all important family time, and you may even find when you DO get out in service, that you are actually enjoying it again. I wish you the best.
CJ -
33
What Has Happened To Us?
by Frenchy ina few months ago during the elders' meeting with the c.o.
i could not help but express myself to him when the subject of meeting attendance came up.
now this is a nice guy as far as c.o.
-
-
3acrewood
Frenchy -
The last talk I heard that really moved me was given by my husband. Not a brag - it's just that he has felt much the same as you - that a speaker needs to REACH his audience. They shouldn't just feel they've been lectured or talked "at" for an hour (45 min.). In fact, they should be so caught up in the talk that they aren't even aware that an "hour" has passed. AND, they should walk away feeling that they've learned a little something too. So, he worked up this particular talk in the form of a story. (He's always been fascinated with storytellers.) It's a very moving story about a young girl and her father and how he handles a particular "mess" she got into. It's got it all - tugs the heartstrings, makes you laugh, makes you cry ... and you walk away with a smile on your face! I love to sit in the back and just watch people's reactions. Not only are there ALWAYS a few tears, but I see all the teenagers in the audience just hanging on his words - and that is the primary group this particular talk is designed to reach, so it's great to see. He has stepped down now temporarily because of overload in other areas of his life, but it just shows that if the brothers care enough put some thought and effort into their talks, our meetings can be interesting and effective.