about six months ago i setup a twitter account.
i posted a few tweets here and there and then got bored of it and stopped.. dispite the fact that i never tweet anything, every few days i get an email notice stating that another person has started following me.. why?
can anyone think of any reason why people would want to follow someone wo never tweets?.
Some are companies, news outlets, or other such accounts that follow you in the hopes that you'll just follow them back.
There are some people, too, that just try to follow as many people as possible.
I got bored with Twitter after about 3 minutes of use.
Elsewhere won the internets!
the wall street journal recently commissioned karen armstrong and richard dawkins to independently respond to the question "where does evolution leave god?".
their thoughts are here:.
http://online.wsj.com/article/sb10001424052970203440104574405030643556324.html.
Those whose God lives in the gaps of science will continue to have issues with scientific advancement. Their God is dying.
I have religious friends who have no issue accepting scientific advancement and find it no threat to their spirituality. Their God will continue to live on.
i was having an email chat with this guy (i dont know him very well) but he wanted a debate on gods existence.
his english is terrible, but can you help me formulate a response please?
he isnt jw, i don't think, but there are some questions here about evolution etc.
Can evoluiton theory explain the cycle of the birth of a baby form the embryo stage to the human being?
The growth of an organism from an embryotic stage to adulthood is not evolution. This guy clearly does not know much about evolution. Debating him is probably pointless. At the very least you need to debate one point at a time.
The fact that science cannot explain (and may never be able to explain) what caused the big bang does not mean it's ok to jump to the "God did it!" explanation. The fact is adding "God" to the equation without empirical evidence merely compounds the problem of explaining the origins of the universe.
How is it different than any other chamois?
you look for stations that sell ethanol free fuel?
have you checked your fuel mileage to note any differences?.
Pretty much all fuel I see around here "contains up to 10% ethanol." If I could find a station that served ethanol-free fuel I would definitely purchase from there. Ethanol gives you worse gas mileage and in some cars can prematurely damage fuel delivery components. (My car is prone to early failures of the high pressure fuel pump when a lot of ethanol is present in the gasoline.)
Get a diesel engine next time. That doesn't have any ethanol added, right?
i never really liked beer, but, i got a hankering for one on the way home from work.
i picked up a six pack of foster's (never tried it before) and i must say, it's prettty danged good.
what do you drink?.
I can't possibly pick a favorite beer. I like so many of them. When I hit the store, I usually look for something I haven't tried before. I'm not a huge fan of porters and stouts, but I will drink most anything else.
I love many of the great microbrews crafted here in the Pacific Northwest, but I still drink mass-produced swill on occasion. Sometimes I crave a light, more watery beer. I'm no beer snob. :)
I tried those 64 calorie MGDs.... couldn't stand them. I'd much rather drink the 95 calorie Michelob Ultra if I'm trying not to drink too many calories (and am in the mood for a watery beer).
if god is outside of nature and therefore cannot be proved or disproved by science, is atheism a form of blind faith?
after all, it cannot be defended on the basis of pure reason.. steven jay gould said;.
"science simply cannot by its legitimate methods adjudicate the issue of god's possible superintendence of nature.
if god is outside of nature and therefore cannot be proved or disproved by science, is atheism a form of blind faith?
after all, it cannot be defended on the basis of pure reason.. steven jay gould said;.
"science simply cannot by its legitimate methods adjudicate the issue of god's possible superintendence of nature.
if god is outside of nature and therefore cannot be proved or disproved by science, is atheism a form of blind faith?
after all, it cannot be defended on the basis of pure reason.. steven jay gould said;.
"science simply cannot by its legitimate methods adjudicate the issue of god's possible superintendence of nature.
And of course Perry uses the weakest debate tactic known to JWD/JWN: accuse the opposition of "being just like the JW's". Lame Perry. Very lame.
