I don't mean to beg the question, but please define "worse". I was watching the History channel this weekend and saw the astoundingly interesting program about the "little" ice age that started in the 1400's or so and went on into the 19th century. Supposedly, the black-death, the Irish famine, the immigration patterns of the US and so on were all fallout from this occurance. But what struck me as unusually cruel was the massive famine that Europe suffered during this time. There were tales of weak, gaunt, boney Irish mothers holding their dead children and begging for money to by caskets for them. Tales of whole families laying in a single bed and slowly dying of starvation together. Now, could a famine like that, of that magnitude, be possible today? The black death is starting to be recognized as some form of ebola, not the Bubonic Plague it has been historically thought of, while, today, the world is gearing up for a chicken flu that has killed a grand total of something like 165 people in two years, but we are trying to be prepared and reduce the affects as much as possible. The last century had mechanized warfare and gases and ovens and bombs that killed bunches and bunches of people in the cruelist ways, but has anybody ever read about what the Romans did to the Gauls, or the Christians did while in Jerusalem during the crusades? Today, our world agonizes and debates and shouts over a single dyckhead in Iraq who ran a "rein of terror" and murder on, what, 200K people? We are human beings, we carry ourselves along in history, and as such, the more we progress, the worse we can be, but, also, the better we can be. The world is what it is, as it always was. The only thing getting worse is the JWs view of it, and, inspite of their BS, their views are for selfish reasons.