Elder video is up~
by alamb 206 Replies latest jw friends
-
-
-
-
-
Leolaia
I loved it when the elder recoiled at the seemingly "apostate" material he was given to read.
I thought the cross-examining attorney was rather weak, but he redeemed himself towards the end by forcing the elder to decide whether a "hello" is or isn't acceptable (the elder ended up saying one can say "hello").
-
TooOpinionated
OMG, the lies fall so easily from his lips. This quy thinks he's quite clever, doesn't he?
Does the attorney and judge know that the elder probably doesn't consider them "worthy" of speaking any truth? Do they know about theocratic warfare? I find it almost impossible to make nonJW's understand this concept.
Thanks, alamb! You have done a yeoman's work today!!!!
-
-
Leolaia
I was wondering about that.
But why didn't the attorney question him further along these lines, i.e. "We have the organization's custody broshure in our exhibits, and you are telling us that as the person chosen by the organization to comment on the organization's policies in a custody case, you have never heard of this piece of literature?" And when he says no, follow that up with: "Are you familiar with the so-called 'Theocratic War Strategy'?"
Did the TWS matter come up elsewhere in the trial?
-
-
cyd0099
Just because the attorney did not refer to WTS materials by the exact name,that guy felt he could deny the materials existance, hoo boy.
And I know we were supposed to avoid all contact with any DF'd in our congo. "Hello" was definitely NOT okay
Thanks for this video. I think a link to point out where he is lying so it makes sense to non-dubs would be helpful.