hey danny,
i think that in the end it doesn't matter. plus, i am not sure what would constitute a consistent and unambiguous definition of "high moral", "good" and "bad"? these things are simple for many transcendentalists because their god does their thinking for them, or i should say, the writers of their holy books have done all the thinking for them. but these things are difficult for an atheist/empiricist to come to agreement on in a wide spectrum of human based interactions. especially if an atheist is also an anarchist, or nihilistic in her views.
one could say that technically, to a theist, or even to the theist's benevolent and omniscient god, an atheist living "better" than he theist deserves the worship that any other god would get. but to an atheist, generally it's a moot point because we sort of "know" that karma doesn't exist. "good" people and "bad" people alike all die the same death, and pay the same price. so there is no need to make a point about it.
if people could focus on the light and energy around them and in them, and remember to breathe deeply into life, and exhale Self, they could stop worrying about the so-called difference between these abstractions that we call "good" and "bad", "right" and "wrong".
ts