I really have to chuckle at the inept responses of the Fundy types to the point raised. One implies, "Hey! Crucifixion is really nasty!" and ignores the problem raised. Another intones, "Ummm, crucifixion not so bad?", again ignoring the actual problem.
Listen you dumb Fundies -- the point raised is simple: In the big scheme of things, Jesus' suffering was not so bad. That doesn't mean that crucifixion isn't nasty. It doesn't imply that Jesus didn't suffer much. It does mean that any supposedly intelligent creature would have to be extremely stupid to trade off a few hours of extreme suffering against regaining the highest position in the universe (or whatever you trinitarians want to think about Jesus' position). Thus, in the long run, Jesus' suffering was trivial, and attempts to make it seem the ultimate sacrifice are just so much emotional claptrap.
AlanF