Some of you have read posts here, and on other forums, in magazines and newspapers, and maybe watched TV commnetary that alleges President George W. Bush is less than brilliant, perhaps under-qualified for office, etc.
Evidence seems starkly missing from these allegations. During Campaign 2000, the media started painting GW as being mentally 'one can short of a six-pack.' But, has anyone, and I mean anyone provided even an ounce of evidence to support this? No, instead those who belittle GW Bush are little more than media "parrots" who gobble up bullshit, while thinking that they are really eating steak.
I did hear, but have not confirmed, that GW Bush university scores, GPA, etc. far exceeded that of Al Gore's. If not true, then that lead dies. If true, then can you imagine what life would be like with Al Gore as President? Yes, Al Gore who claimed to Invent the Internet. The same Al Gore who blamed El Nino~ on human pollution, but failed to tell us that El Nino` was discovered over 300 years ago, long before human pollution could have been a cause?
Dick Cheney: Some think that Cheney is running the show, back at Camp David, while Bush does the PR work. (They are actually being kept apart for security reasons.) But, let's assume that Cheney is the brains of the outfit, and Bush has delegated a lot to him. So what? The sign of a good leader is not that he/she be a super-genius micro-manager running every detail, but rather, a man/woman who leads; that is, who surrounds himself with top people, and coordinates the best team. It seems that with Powell, Cheney, and others, that Bush knows how to pick good people, and maybe his critics have made the error of underestimating GW Bush.
Yes, in the same fashion as Jay Leno put it, how can you go wrong with such names as Dick, Gore, Colin and Bush? - Amazing