BigTex- the facts do not prove evolution
Have you ever been embarassed for someone? I mean, when you see they've really stepped in it but they don't realize? I do not see a lot to work with here. Oh wait, I'm a sheep and simply following others.
i don`t feel `picked on, no more than any other crea, like TopHat, so don`t try and make me out to be the `poor little victim`,
Nor was I trying to. Once again you give me motives and thoughts that I did not have. That you keep displaying such defensiveness and sensitivity frankly says more about you than it does the subject at hand or those who have taken the opposing view. I see more insults coming from you than I see directed toward you.
How can i provide `facts` if what i believe is the genesis account of creation? What sort of `facts` do you want?
Again, I'll repeat something I've mentioned twice before:
A challenge for the creationists: Present two facts, with supporting references, that give strong evidence in favor of special creation
I'll repeat again: I was curious as to whether you had the ability to respond to Alan's question. You've stated your belief, and I accept that. I'm not "wanting" anything from you. I stated I was curious, in an abstract objective fashionl, and yet you seem determined to somehow "get the last word" with me. I'm not sure why, but you seem to be taking this thread rather personally.
Little Toe was not directing the word `wanker` at me, re-read, he has too many manner`s to do that.
>sigh<
Again please read what I actually post.
What I posted about Little Toe was my attempt at humor. I've known him for 3 years and that comment was directed at him. I'm begining to understand the frustration others feel in this thread. Do you actually stop and consider a post before you respond?
You`ve proven that you are just a little sheep that follows the crowd, you didn`t even have the courage to post until you were challenged.
Interesting psychology. Now say something bad about my mother. That'll be sure to get a rise out of me, right?
This is not a subject about which I feel passionate about (okay poor grammar). As I indicated in my first post, I approached this thread with the idea that I was ignorant of either side. I've done so many times before as it often gives an indication of peoples' motivations and abilities to defend their position.
In all candor, reading this thread reminds me of the thread with thirdwitness, (or back in the old days You_Know). When a position is challenged by logic, reason and fact, rather than actually engaging in a discussion with an interchange of ideas and thoughts, some are so insecure they would rather resort to obfuscation and insults.
dido I have not said one insulting thing to you. I have tried in my posts to treat you with respect. That you resort to insulting me tells me a lot about what kind of person you are.
And when exactly did you "challenge" me? You, again, make no sense. I "didn't even the courage to post until [I] were challenged"? When and how did you challenge me that caused me to make my first post? When and how did I display any fear of you, or anything about you for that matter? When and how did I display any fear of this subject?
You seem determined, and paranoid enough, to put anyone and everyone who does not agree with every word, every comma you say, into an enemy. That not being enough, you then want to demonize and impute motives, thoughts and feelings where there are none.