.
Hello, Proplog2:
Long time no chat. You seem to have come a way since we last corresponded. ;-D))))
Your subject is one near and dear to my heart. I have discussed it numerous times on the Internet and many times before.
You see, this subject was probably the main point of contention I had with the Watchtower religion while I was struggling to believe it for years. But when the book Babylon the Great was published, it was the first time I knew consciously that I definitely disagreed with the Watchtower on a doctrine. It was a biggee in waking me up from "The Lie".
Mine was simply by reading the chapter on Babylon the Great.
Without going into what I believe "she" is, let me simply point out that by reading Chapter 18, it has always seemed very clear to me that Babylon the Great has nothing whatsoever to do with religion. She is not about religion. I used to argue that with overseers before and even got warned one time that "you might be right--but you could be disfellowshipped for 'getting ahead of the organization'."
Question: If religion fell the world over tomorrow, would the merchants be weeping and waling? Would they care?
I could write a book on my discussions and arguments on this topic. What's amazing is that the WTS is not the only religious denomination that makes the absurd interpretation that Babylon the Great is religion.
I am a "partial Preterist", but I do not agree with their interpretation that Babylon the Great was solely Rome.
~Ros
(Sorry for the other pseudonym. I used to have two--ros and binadub. They stopped letting us have more than one and I got binadub. :-))