The Wanderer:
On several occasions, it could not be helped but to notice that individuals who
were having these discussions were often heckled, insulted or criticized by those
who were somehow “put off” or offended by the discussion.
I've noticed that. Often, as soon as I get involved in one of these discussions I am heckled for asking questions, correcting mistakes or pointing out alternative, more plausible explanations for the events. It sometimes seems as if those posting about the paranormal don't want anybody disagreeing with them and as you say, actually get offended by the fact that it is discussed critically. This is borne out by comments in this and other threads.
If an individual is confident and convinced that, his is the “right path”, then why do
they feel a need to belittle others who are engaged in a harmless discussion?
Generally they're not confident. The merest suggestion that they or someone they know might be mistaken seems to induce such apoplexies of rage in some people that it becomes impossible to have a rational conversation and discuss the available evidence. This seems to be exactly what they want as there never is any evidence, and the application of reason would damage their worldview.
I don't want to name names but you started this thread so it's not entirely unfair to single you out. In previous threads you have posted spurious information repeatedly. When the validity of the information was questioned you reacted angrily, indignantly accusing people of calling you a liar. When the falsehoods you had posted were rigorously exposed as such, you simply posted the exact same information again as if it hadn't been thoroughly debunked. This sort of disrespectful timewasting on your part can be extremely annoying to anybody looking for a productive discussion. (You are not, by any means, the only person who behaves like this.)
My impression about individuals who engage in these actions are that they seem
to be as curious as everyone else about the subject, but in order to “save face”
and “appease” others who think as they do, they opt to engage in a ridicule
campaign of sorts.
Sort of. Those who refuse to expose their beliefs to the sort of questions that might disprove them are apt to engage in all sorts of behaviour in order to avoid this. They choose to use much lower standards of evidence when it comes to their pet beliefs, they criticise anyone who questions them as being closed-minded, they demand respect for their beliefs no matter how insane and sometimes they avoid even exposing these ideas to an open forum for fear of criticism. It seems that they're unwilling to accept the possibility of a world in which they're not guarded by angels or battling with demons, and therefore indulge in further irrational behaviour to shore up their worldview. Others of their ilk quickly rally round and declare that they too believe in the supernatural incident even though they did not experience it and have never met the person who claims they did.
It's telling that the same names appear again and again in threads about the supernatural. Interesting too, the huge overlap between those who seem to take all supernatural claims at face value no matter how unlikely, and those who refuse to believe the official version of any news event. I'll leave it as an exercise for the reader to ponder why so many people fit into both these seemingly unrelated categories.