May you have peace!
My apologies - I might need to clarify: I did not get the impression that Feenx's father wasn't aware, but that he needed to ask his father questions in order to further clarify and proceed with his "healing," and that part of that healing was writing a book that would help others (dear Feenx, please correct me if I've misunderstood you). And so I see his choice as "help others" potentially avoid/handle such situations rather than be destroyed by it... or protect Dad's... ummmm... "fragility" with regard to it.
Since Dad alreadys know ABOUT it... what is he being "protected" from? The REALITY of it? The PAIN? My goodness, these things are real... and painful. For the victim as well as others. It is almost impossible to avoid that truth.
Am I suggesting he go and say, "Look, Dad, this happened, and I need to deal with it and so do you." No. I am suggesting that IF he intends to publish a book about it (and I hope he does, as silence with regard to matters such as this are the very reason they continue to be perpetuated in the numbers they are!), and he needs information from his dad to do that, that rather than quizzing dad and then using the information without dad's knowledge... or consent... will do WAY more harm... that if he goes to dad and says, "Hey, Dad... look, this "thing" has taken its toll on me and I have to move past it and the ONLY way I am going to be able to do that is to put the pieces in order and put that down in writing, which I intend to publish. To do that, I need your help, I need accurate information. Can you, out of love for me, help me do that?"
If dad says, "You know, son, it's gonna be hard for us both, and I'll probably get into some hot water with the Brooklyn folks, but, okay, I'll do it," well, then, there you go. If, however, dad says, "Uh, sorry, no, son, no can do... and in fact, I don't want YOU to do it and if you do I'll have to write you off," well, then, there you go. But at least EVERYBODY is informed and given opportunity to CHOOSE: dad, as to whether he will help or not, and son, as to whether he will proceed or not.
But, again, given the exorbitant amount of HELP this might provide for an innumerable amount of folks who have gone through the same thing, I still say son might want to weigh the benefits... against the costs. And I don't think, excluding son's own fragility, protecting a loved ones fragile feelings is justification enough to let acts like this go untold.
But then, it's been occurring like this for, what, many millenia, so who am I to rock the boat?
I bid you peace.
A slave of Christ, who believes that concern about "protecting" the feelings of everyone but the victim is the reason stuff like this continues in the numbers it does...
SA