A fair and reasonable question for Jehovah's Witnesses

by Gregor 78 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • Confession
    Confession

    Hi YM... Let me be clear: I am NOT suggesting that Jehovah will hold you accountable for ANYTHING the WTS does--or has done. I'm turning the WTS' own reasoning on them. But I'm beginning to see the folly of that line of thought, since you clearly distinguish yourself as a JW who does not recognize the Society as being what they want to be recognized as. So, if you don't mind (and I'm sure you don't; you seem incredibly open,) I'm going to ask you to play advocate for the WTS.

    You see the ordinary "sales path" (sorry, I'm in marketing) for JWs is this... They become intrigued by what the WTS is teaching. They become convinced that it might be "The Truth." While studying, they are taught that "Jehovah has always used an organization" in his dealings with humans. They accept this. They are further convinced that "what they believe" is of universal import--and that they must "take a stand." Since "Jehovah has always used an organization," and since immense and far-ranging issues are at stake, they come to what seems like a logical conclusion: that the Almighty God of the universe has chosen this organization, that He is working through it, and that they'd better align themselves with it if they expect to "get onto the Ark"--so to speak.

    You have often mentioned your understanding of those who've been wronged by them. That's good of you to have such empathy. To be able to say, 'Look, I haven't been terribly wronged by these guys, but I've seen it happen to others, and it sucks. If you've been similarly treated, (shrug,) I don't blame you.' But I have to ask this: if you know people are being terribly wronged--and if you know that the WTS isn't all they claim to be--why are you still associating yourself with them?

    Does it matter that the bad things are happening--but just not to you? Does it matter that the bad things aren't just "bad," but that the organization won't admit to (or attone for) them? If the answer is that it's not that easy to leave, I understand. But I think there's more to it than that, isn't there? Do you think that Jehovah is actually working through them? If you believe that, in the end, we shall all "stand before Jehovah" and that it's not about what organization we're attached to...why is it a good thing to continue as a member of this one? Why does it make sense to continue with them, knowing that you have to exercise such caution so as not to draw scrutiny?

    Thanks in advance for your thoughtful responses.

  • Sunspot
    Sunspot

    Welcome Yourmomma!

    When you said that you must have missed the memo stating that "all JWs must accept whatever doctrines and policies currently teach"....there IS a WT article on just this idea that I cannot find at this moment. Maybe "Confession" or someone else could look this up and post it so you could see it.

    We were always told (and boasted of) the UNITY that ALL JWs had....and any that did NOT carry these same beliefs, were markd or considered "weak".....even "bad association" if they made their thoughts and ideas known.

    hugs,

    Annie

  • Open mind
    Open mind

    Hey, YM, first off thank you for hanging in here as long as you have. I'm very happy to see you haven't had your eyes glaze over and go into "MUST... RUN....AWAY. BAD....APOSTATES." mode.

    Here's another question related to the one I asked about 6 billion humans being killed at Armageddon. BTW, I think you've got a similar take on this that my wife does. She sees the unfairness in the following scenario. I'll call it the Baptist Brothers.

    Joe Baptist loves fried chicken and twinkies. He loves them so much that he drops dead of a heart attack the week before Armageddon.

    Survey Watchtower says?!:

    Give that hypothetical man a resurrection! (Just tell him no KFC in the New Order but he can still have the twinkies. )

    Jim Baptist, Joe's twin brother who lives down the street, is a marathon runner who takes better care of his health, and, FWIW, is also a little more regular at church. Keeps his lawn in better shape too, but I digress. You know where this is heading right? Jim's health keeps him alive until Armageddon, at which point Jehovah kills him.

    My wife's take on the unfairness of the scenario above?

    God is the judge. (BTW, you haven't been hangin' out with her, have you? ) The Watchtower is off base in their assessment of exactly what will happen at Armageddon. Only the really, really bad people who have hard hearts and basically give God "the finger" (like Nvrgnbk) will be destroyed. (Teezin Nvr.)

    Two questions actually:

    1. Is your take on Armageddon similar to my wife's? Just curious.

    2. If so, then why all the urgency to the preaching work? We hear at assemblies and in Watchtowers that we are "Search and Rescue Workers". Lives are at stake. You know the drill. Do you buy into that?

    Are lives truly at stake based on people's failure to join the JWs when they hear a monotone, Kingdom Ministry "presentation of the month" read to them at their door on a Saturday morning? If it were really so, you'd think a loving God would give us a few special "powers" don't you think? Split a Red Sea? Resurrect a few folks? Something to clearly indicate that JWs are his chosen people. This is the Ark. Line forms here. No. People live or die based on their response to Joe Window Washer standing there in his finest polyester mumbling something about petting lions in the park.

    BTW, if my sarcasm is too off-putting, just say the word. I can rein it in.

    Honestly looking forward to your reply.

    Open Mind

  • moshe
    moshe
    However at this point I do not agree with the society in that all people of other religions will be destroyed because of what that religion has done. Jehovah is going to read the heart condition of each person. It does not make sense that he is going to resurrect millions of unrighteous people and give them all a chance, and at the same time not give other people a fair chance.

    Thank you YM for being honest about this, I never could figure out how the weeding and resurrection was going to work, either. For just a second lets look at this statement you made and I want to ask you a simple question. Would the elders approve of a Bible study getting baptized, if they told the elders that this is what they believed during the Q&A session all candidates have to pass? I think you will agree that the answer is an absolute NO, not a, "you passed the test, Brother Meek ". Perhaps , this means that you have already unwittingly disassociated yourself from the "Worldwide association of Jehovah's Witnesses under the direction of the Faithful and Discreet Slave,aka, the Governing Body and it's legal corporations that control all the KH's , publishing houses and property owned by the WT Corp of PA. ( They don't like to refer to themselves as a religion) Welcome, to our world YM.

    The only thing left for you to do is send a letter to the GB in Brooklyn advising them of your new beliefs ( list them all) and asking them , if it is OK for you to still be a JW while holding beliefs that are contrary to current accepted WT teachings.

    It does not make sense that he is going to resurrect millions of unrighteous people

    Unless Jehovah has a Heisenberg compensator, this isn't going to happen anyway. Trekkie fans or a student of Quantum Physics might know what this means and why it is needed.

  • yourmomma
    yourmomma
    Response to confession: Im not sure I agree when you say that I "distinguish yourself as a JW who does not recognize the Society as being what they want to be recognized as." My current stance is that I believe that Jehovah uses the organization to accomplish the preaching work and give us food at the proper time. However, I dont believe that every word that comes from them is straight from Jehovah's mouth and that I do not have to agree with everything that is printed. You seem to equate a disagreement with anything the WT says as a rejection of the fact that they are used by God. Correct? If thats, so i respect your opinion, however I dont agree.

    Now, as to the 2nd part, I must correct you on something. I have been greatly harmed by them. I have not really said that, so I understand why you think that, but its not the case. I have been greatly harmed, my family has been greatly harmed and my friends have been greatly harmed. To make a long story short, I lost my position (MS), most of my friends, and have been marked because I stood up for what I thought was right. When I encountered politics among the body, I felt as though it was something Jehovah hates, and I stoop up against it and was destroyed over my stand. I dont regret it.

    I am still associating with them because I believe God is currently using them. Not as much as they may think, lol, but using them none the less. As far as why would I stay with all of the bad things going on, frankly if you look down through history, people that were used by Jehovah have always had member who were doing horrific things to each other in the name of God. Some of the most disgraceful behavior in the Bible is done among God's people. Now, granted, this is never talked about or written about, however with a deep study of the Scriptures, you can see it clearly. In the end we do all have to stand before Jehovah, and frankly the organization will likely be gone then. When you look at the Scriptures it goes God-Jesus-Anointed, not God-Jesus-WT Bible & Tract Society INC. That is merely a tool used by God. All these people that think they serve Jehovah but in reality serve the Watchtower, what are they going to do when the system crashes and the WT cant operate?

    Response to Sun Spot: I have looked through all of my posts and have not found the quote you are talking about. Did you make a mistake? What I said exactly was " i missed the memo that made suggestions from the society law." That is much "different than all JWs must accept whatever doctrines and policies currently teach". Im happy to discuss this however we need to clarify what exactly you are talking about.

    Response to Open Mind: Im not one to judge who is an apostate. People who are discussing their being hurt and real problems are not apostates in my book. I know there are some here, but I dont discriminate who I talk to. From my first day picking up the Bible I have always felt that considering both sides of the argument is the only way we find our truth, whats hilarious about this is that if you told your average witness this, they would freak out, but some of the most prominent speakers who have had their stories in the WT have said exactly that.

    Your illustration shows the lack of logic in the thinking that only JW's are saved. This is something that the society has backed away from. I mean alot of witnesses still think this, but the bottom line is NO ONE has the right to judge who is going to make it, thats up to God. Now, i cant speculate at what is going to happen, I have no idea, only God knows. All I know is Jehovah is perfect in justice. Thats the bottom line, he cannot make a mistake in judgment. And when you look at how Jesus treated people when he was on earth and how loving and kind and understanding he was, that tells you how Jehovah is. Now, make no mistake, i will have fear on that day out of awe of Jehovah, and of course its human nature to wonder if he will be happy with you, but I just think how Jesus treated the people who approached him that were fearful. He was very kind and calming and loving. Thats how I picture Jehovah is going to be for people who truly and honestly tried their best to serve him. And to everyone else, frankly, based on what I have read, I just dont see how Jehovah is not going to give them a chance to serve him. I mean, what about the tribal people who cant speak a known language, running around naked and eating rats who have no idea what a book is. They are not going to be given a chance? If not, thats not fair, and Jehovah is perfectly fair.

    You make a valid point about the preaching work. I think part of that is that they are trying to motivate people. Sometimes they do it out of fear and guilt, I dont agree with that. But thats the tactic they use, we will see if Jehovah is pleased with that. I dont think its right. Personally I look to the Bible for the examples of the work and in addition to telling people about God and his kingdom, Jesus was also helping people. I think that helping the widows and orphans is just as important, as well as, and here is a major point, KEEPING THE PEOPLE WHO ARE ALREADY IN. I mean wow, these things are just not done. I have seen it done, I think I was lucky the first 5 years I was a witness I saw wonderful things in regards to this, so I now it exists, its just not common, at least in my experience. Its almost like if a brother or sister is having trouble, they get rid of them because they are considered a problem. But frankly, Ezekiel, I think chapter 34 is discussing that, and people who are guilty of that are in for a surprise. I personally with my ministry focus on helping people, anyone. This is something I am working on, because I need to adjust my thinking that while I think door to door is fine, there are other aspects of it that Jehovah wants and part of that is helping the widows and orphans. I think that if you or your wife is finding a point made from the platform, in a magazine, or made by another person troubling , you can look to the Scriptures for an example and see if it matches what they are saying. The Bible is a nice litmus test because at least where I am, there is alot of unchecked speach at meetings, people saying stuff that is just not correct and no one tells them. About a year ago a young brother who was a servant made the comment that apostasy is people who fall away, like fall away meaning missing meetings, etc. lol!

    Response to moshe: Would the elders allow someone to get baptized with this opinion? I think it depends on how its expressed, what year it was expressed and mainly what kind of elders they are. Are they liberal, conservative? Are they friends with the person getting baptized, or is it a person who is "in" so to speak? An absolute no? I dont think so, no more times than yes? Yes.

    Wow, lol your good. I have already DA'd myself? I dont think so. You seem to think that if i sent a letter written tactfully and respectfully about my beliefs, they would DF me? I dont agree, however if you have any letters sent back and forth from other people, I'll be happy to consider them.
  • Gregor
    Gregor

    YM - "You seem to think that if i sent a letter written tactfully and respectfully about my beliefs, they would DF me? I dont agree"

    If your letter was disagreeing with current WT doctrine you would have a meeting with elders to help re-adust your thinking, a nice way of saying you would be given the oppotunity to disavow your issues. If this could not be done you would be given a reminder, maybe subtle and tactful maybe not so subtle, that you were in danger of being DF'd. Ultimately you would bend or be DF'd. Sorry, but whether you agree or not this is the case.

    Many of your statements lead me to think that you have not been involved very deeply in the org. You seem focused on your own personal spiritual views and that whether JW's are a false religion or not is really not that important to you. Maybe if you were more aware of the harm they've caused and continue to cause you would not be so cavalier about the subject.

  • watson
    watson

    BTT.

    Gregor, thanks for getting this thread going! What a great "snapshot" of the issues on both side of "the argument."

    Welcome Yourmomma. Looks like you're having fun. Careful....it may make you an agnostic, or worse...ask NVR.

  • yourmomma
    yourmomma
    Response to gregor: "I agree if the doctrine we are talking about is weather or not Jesus is God's son, or if Jehovah uses the org, etc. But if its a matter of lets weather or not I have to agree with the suggestions on dress and grooming after the convention then I disagree. If I stated to the org that I think its possible that others will not die because Jehovah reads all hearts, I am not buying that I would be DF'd. If I said "hey, GB, you are wrong, how can you be so judgemental!" then I see how I would, but thats not how I am. I have respect and humilty and even if its my opinion, I certainly dont think its written in stone/ However, if like I said you have letters or some sort of proof to prove me wrong, im all for it.

    As far as being involved in the org, I was a MS, and Pioneer and have had close relationships with PO's and Do's. I doubt there are many things I have not been part of or have not seen. Also, im not sure you can make the comments that you made in the 2nd part of your post without knowing me, can you? I mean, how do you know what I know? I have read this forum for years and I am up to date on all of the issues. In addition, I have seen countless friends harmed by unqualified elders or other witnesses in the congregation. In addition, to make the statement that weather or not JW's are a false religion is not important to me, is another commment that I dont feel is proper. Why do you say this, because I disagree with you? Im cavalier about the subject? Why because I disagree with you? Glad you are so comfortable judging what I think and feel because of my opinion. How do you know what I think about matters or how important these things are? You sound like the strict dubs that make comments similar to yours like "based on your statements you must not have a deep relationship with Jehovah" or "I guess Jehovah's requirements are not that important to you because of your opinion on this or that matter" or "If you knew how important meeting attendance was to Jehovah you would not have such a cavalier attitude."

    Frankly, I have had a great discussion here, however your last post is the first that is degenerated into judgmental, presumptuous, and borderline disresectful comments directed at me all based on what? My opinion.

    Jeez, you have alot in common with the strict JW's at my hall, you just have different beliefs, but your tactics are the same.

    Sorry if my post is coming off irritated, but I think you are out of line.

    Hopefully the others who's conversations I have enjoyed will not follow the same path.
  • Gregor
    Gregor

    What? You can't be serious. There was nothing in my post for you to be offended by. If you are trying to avoid an honest discussion by putting others on the defensive it isn't going to wash with me. Many have read your long posts here and are trying to figure out where you are coming from. You seem to want to defend the WTS while at the same time aknowledging it is badly flawed. By the way, for all the verbiage you've generated here you really haven't answered the basic questions I've asked. I would like to hear your thoughts. Can you condense your reply into a brief, straightforward answer? I think a lot of us thought you were female but since you say you were (are?) an MS guess that's wrong.

    Regards.

    . I am beginning to get the first whiff of a troll

  • yourmomma
    yourmomma
    Hold on, trying to avoid an honest discussion?

    wow.

    your posts speak for themselves. if anyone here thinks i am trying to avoid an honest discussion then that is a joke.

    you sir, are the first person i have come across so far that is not keeping it real.

    conversations with a person who is not keeping it real is a waste of time. you cant come up with a better retort than to question my honesty or make blanket, presumptious statements about what i must think and what kind of person i am because i disgree with you? thats a severe lack of discussion skills and common respect on your part.

    im not going to leave the board however, because to do that for one person is not reasonable. but i cant continue to have a discussion with a person that is going to tell me i am avoiding an honest discussion when i am sitting here sometimes taking an hour to write out a well thought out post to answer questions in the most honest way i can, well frankly that is a joke.

    if there is anyone else here that agrees with Gregor, please post, so I will know to stop posting. i dont want to waste my time nor yours.

    a person that cannot have a conversation without stooping to the level Gregor has is where i draw the line.

    there are other people that i have had discussions with that we have so far disagreed, however they simply raise what they feel are valid points, and we continue to exchange and compare thoughts and ideas without going below the belt and questioning each others "honesty"

    however i want to know if others feel they way gregor does. if thats the case, let me know, and i can move on. that would be a shame because so far i am finding this enjoyable.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit