Hey there D.W.--
You made the statement:
:You also must agree that their are many scientist that are respected by their peers, who beleive that the great first cause is God.
You are insisting that we agree to this statement of yours as though it were fact. I replied:
:Really? I did not know this, who are they?
This is an inquiry into your statement. I tell you I hadn't heard this and ask you to back up your statment with some names. You replied with:
:So are you saying there is no such thing as a scientist that beleives in God? And so feel it's imposible to prove it?
Um, where did I say that? Where did I put forth any opinion regarding scientist's views of God? I claim nothing is impossible to prove, I merely ask you to substantiate your statement, the one you insist that we "must agree" with.
One pointer that may help you along in these discussions D. Wiltshire is this, if YOU make the statement as factual (and insist on agreement from other posters) it is up to YOU to substantiate the statement as factual. You could even get away with claiming it is a theory based on sound reasoning, such is often acceptable. You choose to do neither but instead answer my question with a question. A dead give away you don't have the answer to my question in the first place.
So? Can you tell me about these scientists "who beleive (sic) that the great first cause is God"? Still waiting for that answer...
Regards,
Julie