A newbie here, posted recently that sin is a social construct, i feel that is right. It is something that has been made up by man for control.
Sounds like stuff pumped out of a university sociology class. I know something about that since sociology was my Bachelor college major. Wrote many a social construct paper.
Let's start with a definition of sin:
1. | transgression of divine law |
2. | any act regarded as such a transgression, |
3. | any reprehensible or regrettable action, behavior, lapse, etc.; |
4. | to commit a sinful act. |
5. | to offend against a principle, standard, etc. |
First, God is pretty clear that he put notions of his law inside of the human. I can see this law at work in my 3 yr. old. He seems to know that drastically harming his brother is wrong...even though he is none too happy about his little brothers' arrival and wanted to know many, many times when he was leaving.
Atheists want to claim that they don't need God to tell them what is good...they just know it, how can they have it both ways? Or in the case of sociologists....they can create it for others. But then when faced with their own failures, they claim that is was just some social construct, reasoning that what is good for me necessarily isn't what is good for you.... no moral absolutes. Therefore, it really wasn't so much failure as it was a changing of what was "good".
In other words, when principles are violated ..... don't look for a solution. Change the principles and like magic... no more sin.