If it was indeed a fact that such things were regular occurences than the health department would step in. As for "psychological damage", get real, a pube? Yeah, it's gross, but no reason to get therapy!
Imagine
by John Doe 116 Replies latest jw friends
-
-
changeling
What type of law will you be practicing?
-
John Doe
What if you were a victim of sexual abuse. Say your deranged stepfather made you eat them as a child, and you needed therapy after your meal. Would it still not count as psychological harm?
-
treadnh2o
I'm agree w/ changeling on this.
Where are you going with this JD? -
changeling
That's a stretch in any court, JD.
-
John Doe
If it was indeed a fact that such things were regular occurences than the health department would step in.
Only if people make it an issue.
-
John Doe
Ok changeling. I take it you don't agree with compensation for psychological harm. Does that hold in all cases?
-
changeling
It was not the intent of the restaurant to cause psychological damage.
-
treadnh2o
My stance is to always look forward.
If this is an issue of child abuse, it is no where near the same as a pube in a restaurant. -
John Doe
It was not the intent of the restaurant to cause psychological damage.
Now we're getting somewhere. I take it you require an intent to cause harm before someone can be sued? If someone runs into you with their car, unintentionally, should you be barred recovery because they didn' t mean it? If not, what makes this case different?