No no no, Inrainbow. Comprehension is not the problem. It's all about sorting through a mountain of lies in this world, with limited time. We must determine what is useful information and what is garbage.
Yes I was born a witness, and the realization that 20 years of my life were wasted is very disconcerting. All that time, spent taking in info that wasn't true.
But could it all have been made easier? Yes, if I had listened to my gut. There is no need for me to continuously look for loopholes and mistakes in witness theology. I know it's wrong and wish to waste no more time with it.
Lies lies lies, and who can you really trust? A politician, a religious leader, a scholar perhaps. Hell you can't even trust history, as it is written with bias by the conqueror's and made to look heroic.
As far as scholar's go. Everyone wants to make a name for themselves. I was discussing Noah's flood and was totally taken by Ron Wyatt. It was pointed out to me, that this guy was a sham. So I looked into it, and sure enough, this guy could sell any bullshit. I mean could this guy ever create and fabricate something out of nothing. So I'm glad, I did not waste any further time with it.
Yes you are right. Sitchen is controversial. It wasn't the best link, but all I really wanted to show you was the cylinder with the planets. You see, I have come to understand that any scholar can be refuted. I'm sure there are others with even more opinions that will refute the scholar you just showed me.
Here's the problem. Despite the credentials of the scholars, both you and I, do not know any Summerian language. Therefore, in actual fact, these guys can come up with any prepostrous ideas they want, just like the guys that rewrote the new world translation. and how would we really know who's right.
Will you spend the rest of your days, reading Summerian texts, when there is so many others things to indulge in scholastically? It comes down to trust and a gut feeling.
You see, in this life, you can get bogged down in details. You are the type of guy, that needs to take a beetle, and put it under the microscope and define all it's parts intimately, to conclude that it is indeed, a beetle. Most people don't care about the species, and a complete imbecile can point out to anyone, that what they are looking at, is a beetle.
As an example. Why do we all trust Einsteins theory of relativity? How many of us can sit down, and actually prove mathematically, and understand that E, does in fact, equal MC squared? I'll tell you how, it's a gut feeling. We just know it works.
As I mentioned in my link jokingly, I do not subscribe to all the ideas in the video. I'm glad you pointed out in your link a refutation of Nibiru. It's a bit of releif. I wasn't sure about that one. Still, I can't read Summerian, but my gut tells me, this guy Sitchen has gone too far.
So then, what do we really know about the cylinder depiction? Well, all I can tell you is, those are not depictions of ancient Summerian mosquitoes!
What else do we know for fact? Well, the laws of physics are the same today, as they were 4000 years ago. Conclusion, they used a similar means of Observation.
Why is that, so hard for you to beleive? Because you are bogged down in the detail. You are standing too close to the picture, looking at beetle innards, and you can't see that it's a beetle.
In the model they created to mimic magnetism, they are obviously studying it to find that relationship. If magnetism can create the same effects as the weather in a lab, what kind of effect do you think that has on the planet, with something the size of the earths core? Do you not think a 10% change in the magnetic core is significant? Do you not think, there is a relationship to the wild weather lately? Why does such simple logic elude you? Twirl the zoom on microscope dude. You might see something different.
As far as doomsday scenario's go, I'm not attracted to destruction. I wish I could see something else. But you don't need to pick up any religious book to tell you somethings coming down the pipes. Perhaps you should take your head out the sand and realize that there are amny folks who never read a bible, or had any religious beleif that are seeing exactly what I see coming.
Thats the funny thing about the witnesses. In a way they are right about the end coming, but I do not accept the way they arrive at it. That doesn't mean I'm looking for a way that will make it acceptable. I am simply observing a massive train wreck about to happen.
Can you tell me a prettier and truthful way, of looking at how the weather is behaving? Indeed I suppose I do look for worst case scenario's but don't you think that is a good idea? It's not about what i want to see, it's about accepting the painful truth, no matter what. How else can one be proactive and prepare for the worst. No I'm not building bomb shelters and putting away food rations but I at least like to have an idea of what the hell is going on.
